65_HS1-834228961_62-HQ-83894_Section_006
65_hs1-834228961_62-hq-83894_section_6 · page 266 of 271
Text
A machine read this text from the scan. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
Staunton, Va. Route 3 August 12, 1952 Air Force Intelligence F. B. I. Justice Dept. Of Flying Saucers Fellow Americans, I am writing the same letter to all three Departments on August 14. I wrote a letter, and mailed it on August 2 to the Air Force Intelligence telling my views of a flying saucer. In about four days the physicist and Scott gave out a report of findings identical to my report. Now if I have hit upon the meaning of a flying saucer, I would like to get theOrlist for it. I have reason to believe my ideas have been hi-jacked. It should be easy to find out when did Mr. Scott start his experiment? which office did my letter go through? was my letter placed on file? It had a return address. If you cannot find it that proves it was destroyed and the information used. I have much better working proof of my theory than Mr. Scott, which has been before me all along, until I hit upon the idea. The solution should not have been published. There is a great deal more to it than that, which I can explain. The idea should have been marked out thoroughly and secretly. Rainmakers could probably do a great deal of harm with the answer. RECORDED - 61 INDEXED 61 42-8389Y-29 AUG 4 1952 There is a possibility that it could mean a different type of air warfare. The Air Force could possibly use it for defensive warfare. It could lead to a man-made flying saucer which the enemy could use against us. Let's see p. 113 R.W.I.