John Company

65_HS1-834228961_62-HQ-83894_Section_006

65_hs1-834228961_62-hq-83894_section_6 · page 266 of 271

Page 266 of 271 of 65_hs1-834228961_62-hq-83894_section_6

Text

A machine read this text from the scan. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

Staunton, Va.
Route 3
August 12, 1952

Air Force Intelligence

F. B. I.

Justice Dept.

Of Flying Saucers

Fellow Americans,

I am writing the same letter to all three Departments on August 14. I wrote a letter, and mailed it on August 2 to the Air Force Intelligence telling my views of a flying saucer. In about four days the physicist and Scott gave out a report of findings identical to my report. Now if I have hit upon the meaning of a flying saucer, I would like to get theOrlist for it. I have reason to believe my ideas have been hi-jacked. It should be easy to find out when did Mr. Scott start his experiment? which office did my letter go through? was my letter placed on file? It had a return address. If you cannot find it that proves it was destroyed and the information used.

I have much better working proof of my theory than Mr. Scott, which has been before me all along, until I hit upon the idea.

The solution should not have been published. There is a great deal more to it than that, which I can explain. The idea should have been marked out thoroughly and secretly. Rainmakers could probably do a great deal of harm with the answer.

RECORDED - 61

INDEXED 61

42-8389Y-29

AUG 4 1952

There is a possibility that it could mean a different type of air warfare. The Air Force could possibly use it for defensive warfare. It could lead to a man-made flying saucer which the enemy could use against us.

Let's see p. 113

R.W.I.