Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14 (Analysis of Reports of Unidentified Aerial Objects)
CIA-UAP-015 · page 101 of 312
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
I I I These 12 sightings can be classed into four categories on the basis of their shapes, as follows: ( l} Propeller shape - Case I I (2) Aircraft shape - Cases II and III I (3) Cigar shape - Cases IV and V I (4) Elliptical or disc shape - Cases VI to XII The criterion for choosing the above sightings was that their descrip I tions were given in enough detail to permit diagrams of the objects to be I drawn. It might be noted here that in all but one of these cases (Case XI) the observer had already drawn a diagram of what he had seen. The objective of this section of the study was the conceiving of a I model, or models. The requirement that the description be detailed is an I important one, and was the easiest to determine in the re-evaluation pro gram. However, a good model ought to satisfy the following conditions as well: I ( 1) The general shape of the object and the maneuvers it performed should fit the reports of many of the UNKNOWNS and thus explain them. I (2) The observer and the report should be reliable. I (3} The report should contain elements which should have been observed with accuracy, and which eliminate the I possibility that the sighting could be ascribed to a familiar object or to a known natural phenomenon. I (4} The model should be derived from two or more good UNKNOWNS between which there is no essential conflict. I It can be shown that it is not possible to deduce a model from the 12 cases that will satisfy all of these conditions. The following case-by-case I discussion of the 12 good UNKNOWNS will illustrate this point: I ( 1) Case I does not satisfy Conditions 1 and 4. The reported shape of this object is not duplicated in any of the other UNKNOWNS. I I •(2) Case II does not satisfy Conditions 1 and 3. There are very few UNKNOWNS in the aircraft shape classification. In addition, the unusual characteristic of this sighting I (i.e., the red glow) could have been reflection of the lights of Flint from the objects if they were either birds or aircraft. 91 I