Department of the Air Force Committee to Review Project Bluebook, 1966-1967

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

d.
Objects in the Groat Falls case wore believed to have
probably been aircraft, ;;1.nd the bri~ht lights nuch roflections.
o. There was no valid reason for tho attempt to relate the objects
in the Tremonton sighting to those in tho Great Fa1J.s sight­
ing. This may have been duo to misundersta.ndine in their
directive. The objects in the Groat Falls sighting are
strongly suspected of being rofloctions of aircraft known to
have been :in the area.
f. The intensity change in the Tremonton lights was too great
for acceptance of the P.I.L. hypothesis that tho apparent
moti.on and changing intensity of tho lights indicated oxtreme1y
high speed in small orbital paths.
g..
Apparent lack of guidance of investigators by those familiar
with U"F.O. reports and explanations.
h. Analysis of light intensity of objects made from duplicate
rather than original film. The origin:11 film was noted to
.
have a much lighter background (affecting relative brightness
of object) and the objects appeared much less bright.
'
i. Method of obtaining data of light intensity appeared faulty
because of unsuitability of equipment abd questionable
I,
assumptions in making averages of readings.
j. No data had been obtained on the sensitivity of Kodachrome
fi1m to light of various intensities using the same camera
type at the same lens openings.
- lJ -
NW 90306"
Docld:34714841 Page 61