John Company

Film Analysis of Unidentified Objects, 1953

DOW-UAP-D098 · page 3 of 23

Page 3 of 23 of DOW-UAP-D098

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

U.S. NAVAL PHCYrOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION CENTER
U. S. NAVAL RECEIVING STATION
-.._ ~ ·-
Washington 25, D. C.
MAT <l
1953
Code Ol/IDIW/lbl
Jl2
Serial:
cBJ.~m
SECURITY INFORMATION
From:
Off'icer in Charge
To:
Director of Naval I ntelligence (OP-322H4D)
Subj:
Interpretation of Movies of Unidentified Objects;
progress report on
♦
Ref:
(a) Conf ltr DNI OP322Y5/rtm, dtd 27 Oct 1952 with
enclosures thereto
(b) Conf memo, Chief, Topical Division, USAF, AFOIN
2P2., dtd 24 Nov 1952 with enclosures thereto
(c) PIC Conf ltr 01/ml'w/gcl, ser 0263 dtd 5 Dec 1952
(d) Rest memo, Chief, Topical Division, USAF, AFOIN
2A2, dtd 16 Feb 1953
Encl:
(1) Charts 2-13
1. Reference (a) is a request from u. s. Air Force for the
i nterpretation of movies of unidentified objects taken in Utah,
2 July 1952. • I ncluded among the enclosures are approximately 30 feet
of processed, 16mm color motion picture film and a list of questions
for gui®nce in ,determining the type o-f analysis desired. Referenc.e
(b) requested interpretation of additional movies taken in Montana,
1950. This report superced.es reference (c) and presents the test
procedures and methods designed to ~nswer the questions contained in
enclosure 7 of reference (a). The results and analysis were performed
by the Photogrammetry Division, Evaluation Department of this Center
and do not necessarily represent the official attitude of the Depart­
ment of the Navy or this Center.
2. Tests and Procedure.
a. Plots.
The film exposed in Ute.his i n very poor condition; dry,
brittle, and With a tendency to break.
Af'ter i nitial viewing,
duplication of the film was performed in order to\preserve the frlm.
In the duplication process some color correction ~s made to permit
better Viewing of the objects. To prepare plots of the objects, a
stop crame projector was rigidly mounted at a fiXed distance from a
finel;-groW1d glass screen. The magnification was 22 times giving
a format size of 14.2" wide. This proved very satisfactory and
provided a shadow free image upon which overlay plots could be made.
CC>m"~l'UAb
SECURITY INFORMATION
I