AAWSAP DIRD, Inertial Electrostatic Confinement Fusion, March 2010

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

UNCLASSIFIED/ /FOR OFFI&IAk WS& ONkY
The corresponding ion density profile, shown in Figure 4.8, has a high value inside the
virtual cathode (center core plasma) and also a peak in front of the grid (real cathode).
Radius [m)
Radius [ml
Figure 4.7. The Double Well Potential Calculated With
Figure 4.8. Ion Density Profile for Potential
IXL Code for d1Jperp, i=14keV, I 1=SSA, I e= S9A
Well Shown in Figure 4.7
An important new insight obtained in
the study revea led that these potential
profiles create ion density distribution
functions completely different from the
ones observed when a single well
electrostatic potential exists. Two ion
density peaks were commonly observed
- one in the central IEC core region, and
one near the cathode wire grid as seen
in Figure 4.8. In this manner, the single
ion peak created by the single well
potential is split into two peaks. The
central ion peak has a much sma ller
radius than the original peak. This
causes higher ion densities to occur in
20
30
40
so
Cllhodc CWTCDI [Al
60
70
Figure 4.9. The D-D Fusion Reaction Rate Versus
the central potential well, which is
Cathode Current for dEperp, 1 =8 keV
essential for the achievement of high
fusion rates. However, since the fusion core radius iin these calculations is very sma ll ­
on the order of 0.4 cm - 0.9 cm, the total number of neutrons emitted per second is too
low to create useful fusion power (see Figure 4.9). Still, the physics principles
Illustrated provide important insight into injection issues.
A reduced angular momentum spread and higher injection energies would be required
to correct the well volume problem. Still, the 0-0 fusion rate scaling of 15 is
encouraging, and it is indeed surprising that this large angular momentum spread
achieves such distinct double well structures. As stated in Section I, the current scaling
for beam -beam reactions is strictly 12. However, as shown by Tzonev et al., nonlinear
changes in the potential well shape and ion density profile combine to cause the higher
power current scaling law. It would be anticipated, however, that this effect would
saturate at some current, tending back to the fundamental I2 relation. Along these
lines, it should be noted that prior investigators also predicted scaling laws with
y - ml•mOAS
Error
80
ml
9.5163c-08
1.51 SSe-09
Ot q
9. 1482
NA
70
R
0.99906
60
j 50+----+-----+--+--•/'f'
-
- 40 _ ________,
~ 30
0
o wr--;r---,--zr--;t:====t===:::1...,.
o.i...-,.:j~.:+-t-1-+-+++-+-+-+-t~~......+-1
UNCLASSIFIED/ /FOA &FFI&IAk WSE O,.LY
40