Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part II, 1965
NASA-UAP-D017 · page 251 of 290
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
243 White McDi vitt White McDivitt White McDi vitt We had one area where we were a bit too ambitious, and this was in the stars for the Air Force D-9. We reviewed this, also, so there was no lack of planning. It just turned out that using these stars in the sequence that we had for them,with the type of fuel constraints that we had imposed upon us, we just couldn't effectively run the ex periment without using a great deal of fuel. Yes . And I think that this came about just because of a lack of lmowledge on everyone's part, on just what we could handle in the spacecraft and the rates that the stars move through the skies . That was something t hat we learned on this flight. I think so . I think that's part of the qualitative data that we brought back for D-9, but I do feel that the pre-flight planning for D-6 was completely inadequate. Anything else on a:n.y of the other ex periments? No, I think the other experiments were well briefed to us . We understood them quite ~ell and I think the procedures were well taken care of. That's right. Let me clarify one thing. I t hink t hat the technical aspect of D-6 was one of the best briefed of all the experiments. The DOD people