Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part II, 1965
NASA-UAP-D017 · page 278 of 290
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
270 ting it . I thought this was very good. We had another briefing on experiments in the flight plan review about six weeks before the flight, and we had another experiments review about ten days to two weeks before the flight . Again, I felt that each and every one of these was certainly time well spent. I think that, probably,the first experiments briefing might have taken place a little sooner. White I've got a comment on D-6 here. Ten days before the flight, they came in with the infor mation for D-6 and said, "How do you want to run the tracking on D-6 and send the infor mation up?" This was not the time to bring up this type of information or try to make this type of decisions. These decisions should have all been firmed up at the six- weeks briefing, and this is what the six-weeks briefing was for. It was to tell us how we were going to run our experiments. After that time there weren 't supposed to be any changes to the procedures , and 10 days before the flight was just to incorporate any last-minute changes a.nd solidify