Gemini 4 Experiment Debriefing, 1967
NASA-UAP-D018 · page 109 of 224
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
' . . Belt 18 9 it ' in the proce sing - must be in the lens under the film. The - down at the bottom part kind of duplicates and lets magnitude look on top and that's really not fair. It doesn't reflect down and what you see is only on top. Did you see any difference between moonsets and moonrises? No, I dido 't . Did you see any (classing) .......... of t he moon? The elongation that you see? No. I didn't. I didn 't notice any. I thought the interesting thing, too, about the moon is that clarity - t hat I you see it ' s quite clear whe·n you l ook at it here, but also it just looked l i ke a little silver globule going down. It just goes right down. You have no scanning or anything associated with it. And no ....... , either. That 's right, it goes right down. And also, your vieWing of the stars beyond my cpmment on this earlier doing this. It doesn't obscure your vieWing - the moon being up there doesn 't particularly bother you as far as the ( stars?) ...... . Then you could always tell where the horizon was because of the stars which you know appeared. And then the airglow. Could you also tell from the stars? ...... sort of a supplemental picture of the horizon from the stars?