Gemini 4 Experiment Debriefing, 1967
NASA-UAP-D018 · page 118 of 224
Text
A machine read this text from the scan. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
Belt 19 9 I think the dim gradation is excellent. I think we need a little variation of brightness. Did you find any difference in the two windows? Did you see any ventigral difference in those two windows? We couldn't change places. Ha Ha Ha See I looked in mine, he looked in his, and there wasn't any way in the world that we could-- You couldn't get near enough to start a ration? No. No. You really can't. Independent of your ration. You're pretty safe to check your radical brightness against the bright cloud right on the earth. You know on a bright day like this. Shoot, they said it was checked against the snowbank. You can't bank there. You're in trouble. Unless there's a............ A couple of times I was looking for it. Those were dirty St. Louis snowbanks. (snowguns?) Ha Ha Ha O. K., I think......the more you want to say. If you'll wrap it up. I think between this morning and Jim and Ed's comments this afternoon we can extract everything we present...... I'd like to say something. The way it looks right now, you have 11 experiments and everyone of them is a total success. There is no indication that there's anything, any anomaly and there's no indication that there will be any anomaly. Just a quick look........ Certainly nothing operational, I mean it's not operational........ There's nothing at all. Now you've got a couple of equipment problems, but you expected that I'm tols. It was perfect as far as 82