Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965
NASA-UAP-D020 · page 143 of 325
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
138 FCSD Rep I agree, incidentally on all the Apollo landmarks landmarks we ' ve got here. I ' m not sure I agree , in general, with any of the Apollo landmarks that they havp . I think there are lots more distinctive l and mark features around the country. I think that their idea of selecting a point of land down in the water is good, but I think that there are numerous places around the world where , say a large river comes out and intersects with the ocean naybe at a point , at a point in a river and things ,f this type, would be even more distinctive or an inter section of a river and the ocean , or an intersection of something in the type of causeways i n Miami or the causeways here at the Cape where the;r cross the water with a very prominent water landma:~k. They' ll give you a very accurate telescopic poin-; to sight. on, whereas the particular points of lancl that they have selected are not really accurate type sighting points for real accuracy, I don ' t feel . They're r easonably distinctive, but I don ' t thin}: any--nearl y as distinctive as a lot of other areas around the country that could be selected. Okay, why don ' t you look through these things her e and see if there is anything there that you haven' t covered. €ewfl~if>.f"pl,Ofl