Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965
NASA-UAP-D020 · page 180 of 325
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
,,,. in PULSE. Cooper That's right. We actually only bad it in PULSE. Conrad And really what it is--as a matter of fact , firing in PULSE and everything--you could always keep the ~9rizon in sight. Cooper You could keep the horizon in sight and we had the red lights on, and only we didn't have them down dim and firing just in pulse you could hold the attitude visually very well, but when you go into any amount of RCS thruster firing you've lost the horizon. Conrad Yes. Cooper Okay. One thing we have here on thruster firing both attitude and translation. I think we covered attitude pretty well. I think our OAMS was a very good attitude system to begin with. I think it was gradually degrading as the flight went on. Getting worse and worse and worse and mushier and sloppier so it was not fair to evaluate it later on in the flight because it was pretty miserable. But the RCS attitude was beautiful. It was really good. It was crisp and real precise and just a real pleasure to fly. Translation, we