Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965
NASA-UAP-D020 · page 226 of 325
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
215 cCQMAO£MIA L would screw it in too tight so I would get one more picture off and then it would jam, and I would back it out a little bit. We finally got to where it worked pretty good. Cooper But this still is an equipment discrepancy that should be- Conrad Yes , and equipment discrepancy and it almost cost us a couple of good pictures . Especially, when we hadn't found the ship about four times and all of a sudden the camera was jammed....wall light fit in there . I might say here that this is D- 1, D- 2, and D-6. D-1 we got, D-6 we got quite a bit of, and D- 2 we did nothing. What we are t alking about is the camera equipment associated with D-1 and D- 6. Cooper Acquisition Techniques--They varied. Acquisition techniques varied depending on whether it was a celestial or ground target. Again we can' t emphasize ~nough to do experiments where you have to point to certain places to find things the only way to do it in a professional manner is to have a plat form up and use the pointing angles. It makes the task a thousand times easier and it eliminat es all