Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965
NASA-UAP-D020 · page 249 of 325
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
238 here again, I say I realize why we wer,= trying to sal vage what we could out of a bad sit11ation but it didn 1t really do justice to the expt=riment. We never r eally once really gave the expe:C'iment as far as the ground observation, a really fa:Lr chance. And the one time when we really did give it the most fair chance, when we did have attitude control , was extremely bad weather -- the haze was ·)ad -- it was just about like the day when we went over it in the airplane trying to do those observations, it was a low sun angle and haze and the vis:Lbility in the area was not real overly good. Pete ' s already covered the window measurements checkli st . I think that t his whole _experiment was very well laid down and very well prepared for and that the people con cerned with this experiment did a real fine job of • it - Conrad I have to make one comment though, I think that the target size was small enough such that the target itself , although it had the high contrast ratio with the surrounding background, that they were looking for , you know so it would stand out, was lost in the acquiring -- in other words, th3.t thing was designed for our close overhead work to see it, and therefore,