Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965
NASA-UAP-D020 · page 38 of 325
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
33 Cooper I think we had some bias, just how much I don ' t lmow. The timing of the translation was fine , updating was fine. Operations and checklist were okay. Computer usage, okay. Conrad It was easier to make a burn on the simulator that had no up-down or left and right in it than it was in the spacecraft. Gordo did a real good job of tracking on every burn and I didn't see it wander hardly at all. Cooper And all the IVI ' s would be zero. Conrad And all the IVI 1 s would be zero, but we'd have .4. of 10 a foot in one axis and ~O in another. Conrad 8 Yes. The worst cross- coupling, we had 10 in one axis, and when we burned in the platform mode, but we were checking that. It could have been accelero meter bias again, or, the spacecraft is more sensi • tive to picking up up- down and l eft right velocities than I thought it was . Conrad Gordo did a real good job of tracking. He tracked as well as he did in the simulator and we never had this show up in another axis in the simulator. Cooper It would be zero , zero, zero in the simulator. Conrad It was hardly worth my time checking address 81 and 82 in the simulator because I could just tell he