Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965
NASA-UAP-D020 · page 97 of 325
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
92 .. a ef ◄ FIE)l!I ◄ 'Pl~L Conrad Cooper Conrad Cooper Conrad Cooper Conrad Cooper Conrad And the analog range was in close agreeme:'lt with the digital range when the REP was going away from us. Yep. The GLV fuel and oxidizer pressure gauges worked excellent except for the IPS. Stage two IPS fuel gauge failed to the full max deflect:i.on posi tion just shortly before POGO started, ancl stayed in the OFF position until after staging. It came back on and worked for about a minute and then went back off again. The altimeter worked just like it worked in the altitude chamber. Stopped at 96 800 feet . It was very jerky on the wa:y up. It was erratic going up. And I don ' t guess you ca.n expect a pressm·e alti meter like that to follow as fast as that booster is moving. It's r eally winding up. Coming back on reentry, why, we were apparently a lot slower on the other aide of it, because it unwound in a.n extremely steady manner and it seemed to be right with the barostat . It was right on the barostat , actually. And this is really the important thing.