Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965
NASA-UAP-D021 · page 168 of 222
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
158 in the daylight--of course the site was not manned because of the few passes we'd have to have . When we were over Australia we didn't have attitude control . Lovell We might menti o.n one thing. I think with the l ong flight like we had, if we had the fuel we could have become more skilled in observing the site and probably have gotten better results . Borman No, we coul d not have on thi s o.ne, because after the 3rd day the clouds were the factor the whol e t i me. We had only 3 days to observe that, a.nd everything el se was cl oudy. Lovell Okay, it was cloudy, but I suspect that the more passes over the thing, you woul d get better. But we just did not have the fuel and the weather was bad. 11, 5 Synoptic terrain (S-5) and weather (s-6) photogra phy Borman Synoptic terrain a.nd weather photography. On unusual or significant subject matter. Well, it turns out we did not have any unusual or significant subject matter as far as I know . We t ook the sequences and we took a l ot of it as genera l photography that was not even called up. Most of the time, it had t o be done in drifting flight. We were sorry about this , but there was not the fuel availabl e. The two sequences that wer e called up (where we were allocated the fuel from the ground) we t ook them. I hope they were well done. We did get some