Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965
NASA-UAP-D021 · page 206 of 222
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
196 never contacted anyone else. We didn't go direct to anybody. Borman We might mention that the systems briefings were really of two types. We had preliminary systems briefings by our FCSD people at Houston. At Mc Donnell, du.ring the SD1S flights and altitude chamber tests we filled in the dead time with systems bri efings from the people at McDonnell. This was a good way to go also. For instance, while one crew was flying the MAC Rendezvous Simulator practicing station-keeping, the other crew was getting systems briefing. So, we didn't have any dead time. It worked out well. Borman The station-keeping , on the booster was more difficult than it was on GT-6, primarily because the booster was venting, and tumbling and trans lating. Also because of the fact that we really didn't have a lot of time. We were having to use fuel in order to get set up before night, for the separat~on burn. However, once we got it squared away, there was no difficulty at all staying with the booster at a distance, I'd estimate from about sixty to one hundred and fifty feet. During