Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965
NASA-UAP-D021 · page 213 of 222
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
• Lovell Borman Lovell 203 like Systems Assurance and so on in St. Louie. It is a waste of time. At St. Louis you should plan on covering the SIM flights , the Altitude Chamber and the Horizontal SEDR. And, down at the Cape, I thought even though we cut out six days of testing and we did not have a Wet Mock, I saw absolutely no impediment at all to our launch training. I do not think that any of it is necessary. I do not think we cut out one necessary thing. I think that you could use your t ime more wi sely in simula tor training, in recovery training, and in training you are really going to use than in study of some of the sys tems assurance tests where you spend hours in the spacecraft just throwing switches. You reach a point there where you are not learning any more. I think you should follow, at St. Louis , the SIM flight , the Altitude Chamber, and the Horizontal SEDR. And down here at the Cape, we want to do the SIM flight, the Joint Combined Systems test , the EIIV test , and finally of course, the SIM flight and Stowage Review. That is somethi ng which we put in, and I think ought to be included in all._. the stowage is one thing that changes constantly right after launch, and it ought to be put in just before launch. A week or so before launch to make sure everything is correct .