Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965
NASA-UAP-D021 · page 52 of 222
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
42 So that was very good work on the gro-.md ' s part. Lovell It looks like the initial computation of retrofire time was off, and they already had a good o~bit on us. Borman I don't kno~ what it was, but they corrected it when we came in. 5.10 Post Retro Jettison Checklist Borman The post retro jettison checklist was accomplished with no problem. Oh, I'm thinking; we did have some discussion about as far as the retro goes. With the--we ' ll cover this more fully under su.i.ts. The question was whether to leave those hoods on or off for retrofire. We found th,'3-t the noise and the--I don't know why ~e didn't notice this at launch, but we did during reentry, the noise from the air blowing in the G5C suits was an impediment to crew discussion. Lovell It would go on the mikes and make a lot of noise on th; mikes. The mikes picked up a lot of whistle. Borman. Plus the fact that the vision out of that thing certainly needs to be imporved. So, we didn't kno,1 what to do--·,.;e finally decided to leave them on for retro.fire. 6.0 REENTRY 6.1 Reen-gz Parameters '[:edate Borman Reentry. 400,000 feet, we had that time updated; and at 400,000 feet I rolled left 55 degrees, because this...or fifty degrees, the value of the backup angles at tha t time.