Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965
NASA-UAP-D021 · page 80 of 222
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
70 ate and after I started f lying the needles. Lovell Because you were overshooting with DIRECT? :Borman Right. I was not able to get the fine control I wanted. It would not stay in there. It seemed like the spacecraf't was picking up a torque in roll also, and I was having to watch it too close. Lovell And this was different th&n what we had in the simulation. :Borma.n Yes. REENTRY RATE COMMAND we never used. DIREC'l! we used once for tracking the Reentry Minuteman in order to catch it. It was moving so swiftly. We al so used it in the ini tial phases of reentry, and it worked fine. The PULSB mode, of course, was the one we lived with most throughout the 14 days. I thought it was an excellent mode. Lovell It is a gas saver and even when you do have a platform the PULSE mode is adequate for most of the work you can do- for any attitude control, ground terrain observations-except for rapid rotations where you need a faster authority. :Borman Right. All ground tracking, PULSi was adequate. We did not have any problem at al l. We were able to track the Polaris using PULSE. Everything except the reentry~ we could use PULSE mode. The IlORIZON SCAN mode was fine. The only thing I noticed there was at sunrise and sunset some times, we were driven to a 30 or 40• nosedown pitch attitude