Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965
NASA-UAP-D021 · page 84 of 222
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
74 have said, it is a very tight and fine mode. We used it during most of the reentry. REENTRY RATE COMMAND we did not use. DIREC~ I used for the first part of the reentry, and it seemed that we were picking up rolling torques , and I was also starting to pick up pitch and yaw oscillations as the gs were coming on. They were slight ones but I really wanted to get the spacecraft steady, end I was really trying to lock it in on the attitude indicator, so we went to RAT~ COMMAND. I didn't see any reason to bring back a lot of RCS fuel anyway. REENTRY RATE COMMAND we did not use. The PUISE mode wa.s used in the reentry prior to guidance initiate, and it worked fine. Retrofire attitude control was excellent and I'm gl ad we bad RATE COMMAND there because we had no outside reference at all. Retrofire was done on the ball with the rate needles, and I thought the rockets were outstanding. Yes.h, outstanding, I thought they were a little more powerful than I had anticipated. Lovell Q;uite all right. Borman Reentry attitude control deadbands and rate damping was fine. The only thing, I guess, that was wrong with RATE COMMAND was the fact that it uses an awful lot of fuel. But, it certainly holds that spacecraft steady as a rock. The heater lights - we solved that problem very easily. We