Congressional, White House, UFO-related Constituent Correspondence, 1998

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

.
. .
.. . '
:,,.;.
I
..
J ◄
~-.,., .
•·/ 7
•
JI
._!' ~.
"'1
,..,·.·
..,
~
,,;r.1_( J~; .•..,.- . .:.; ._ - .. ~. . • _•• /
• • ~
(?-2)
T wo obiecu drifting out of open hatch (lowe, r ight) of Geminl-12. Both spe_cks are out of focus and hence are within sevoral feet of camera.
-which h ad• very large depth of field. Object on right, in focus, i• a scrap of paper. NASA photo S-66-62871.
preceding them all the way." The
origin of that mileage figure is obscure,
but it lends unwarranted authenticity
to the report.
Observatories
in
Europe
also
watc:ied the two UFOs. ether sources
re\'eal. Embellishing the story. another
UFO source claims that "Next day,
the 15th, at 21.15 hours, one bright
revohing light approached the Apollo
12 spacecraft." Fawcett, not to be
outdone,
also
claims
that
the
astronauts photographed the UFO (or
UFOs).
One of the loudest proponents of
the Apollo-12 UFO is APRO research
director Or. James Harder. At a UFO
symposium
at
the
University
of
California at Santa Cruz on November
8, 1975, Harder claimed that one CFO
"followed Apollo l'.! on three orbits
around the moon". Further, "N,\SA
suppressed the UFO incident~ for fonr
of p,1nic", but Harder was ahle to
discover the si~hting~ b"cau$e it " was
disclosed by a member of the space
team" who he refused to id1:ntif:: .
51