Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

19. in cc,._;,partson ~1th otheiofficers of his i,ide.and appr~xlmatft' length. ot'service ·or approximate length of duty assignment, to what degree has this officer exhibited
the folloYflng qualities?
(a) PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE (Consider the requirements of his various duty assignments and compare them to his professional knowledge.)
•·
HOT OBSERVED
□
Has excefttional knowledge
of his
uty assignments.
Extremely well informed.
Hes excellent knowledge of
most phases of bfs duty
assignments. Is well in•
formed on the remalnlng
phases. Occasionally dem•
onstrates exceptional knowl­
edge.
Is well Informed on most
phases or his duty assign­
ments. Frequently demon-
stratas excellent knowledge.
Has satisfactory knowledge
or routine phases or his duty
assignments.
Serious gaps In his knowl•
edge of futidamentals of hla
duty assignments.
(Adverse)
•
I
I X
I
I
•
(b) COOPERATION (Consider ablllty and wllllngness to work In harmony with and for others.)
..,
NO ,, OBSERVED
□
Extremely successful fn
working with others. Has
en outs&andfng ability to ,
; create harmony;.
I
Promotes harmony fn deal-
Ing with others. A very
-. g~ team wo~~er.~­
.L
Gets along well with most
people. Knows bow to take
ord~ ~its In with a~­ ..
X
'I.
Indifferent to others .
Oooperates occaslonally.
-
•
Inclined to create friction.
Oenerallr not cooperative.
(Adverse)
(c) 'JUDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a sltuatloh, think clearly, and develop' correct and logical conclusions.)
HOT OBSERVED
□
Outstandingly sound and
logical thinker with an
exceptional grasp or the
situation Involved.
Exceptionally good Judg­
ment based on sound evalu­
otlon or all the factors
Involved.
Judgment ls usually sound
and reasonable.
Is prone to neglect or mis-
Interpret facts. OccasJon­
ally commits errors In
Judgment.
Due to faulty Judgment, his
decisions or recommenda­
tlons are too frequently
wrong.
(Adverse)
•
I
I
X
I
l
•
(d) LEADERSHIP (Consider his ability In organizing, obtaining the cooperation of others, and In directing their efforts effectively.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Outstanding skill In direct-
In~ others results in a very
e ectlve unit. Ins~lres con­
fldence even un er very
difllcult cJrcumstances.
A consistently good loader.
Commands respect of his
subordinates. Is very effeo­
tlve under difllcult clrcum­
stances.
Ospable leader. Develops
good oooperatlon and team
work In difficult cJrcum•
stances. Knows bow to give
orders.
Generally obtains effective
cooperation under normal
cJrcumstances.
. '
Falls to command. Unable
to exert control.
(Adverse)
•
I
I
I
X
I
•
(e) PROMOTION POTENTIAL (Consider his capacity to handle Jobs of Increased scope and greater responslblllty, ablllty to learn rapldly, personality, self-Improvement
efforts, special ablllties, and trafnlng.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Oapableof Increased respon­
slblllty and rapid advance­
ment.
•
I
Very promising promotional
matenal.
I
Demonstrates promise for
further growth at moderate
rate.
I
X
Present Job Is taxing his
ca~abilities. Requires con-
sf era~!e amount of training.
I
Definitely limited.
(Adverse)
•
(f) MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS (Consider his utlllzatlon of men, money, and.. materlals.)
HOT OBSERVED
□
· .. ·.)
Is most effective' fn the utlll­
zation of men, money, and
lll.Bterials.
Is effective In accomplishing
extra savings In men mon­
ey, and materials by bnple­
mentlng and malntairiing
:E
roved management pro­
ures.
Oonse"es men, money, and-
materials effectively by im•
E!ementing and maintain-
g routine management
procedures.
Utlllzes men, money, and
materials in a barely satts­
factory manner.
Is needlessly wasteful of
menlnmoney, and materfala.
Is
esponslble In this
regard. (Adverse)
•
I
I
I
X
1
•
(g) REMARKS. Marks In any of the starred <-> boxes must be Justified In this section with a brief description of the factors which were considered In evaluating the
officer. The Justification shourd be In concrete and specific terms.
Not applicable.
20. State your estimate of this officer's capacity for orlglnal and constructive professional work and lndlclite to what degree his performance during this reporting
period has reflected that capacity. State concrete attainments wherever possible. If not observed, so state.
~
.
.
Not observed.
21. (a) As a general rule, officers should not be shown their fitness reports by the reporting seniors unless the report contains adverse matter. An adverse report
must be referred for statement pursuant to Article 1701-(8) Navy Regulations. His state
be attached to this report.
IS
Has the officer re orted on seen this re ort?
YES D
4 OCT 1g~q
T. w. SOUTH II
22. DATE ~flWARpED ----------------- -~3. _______;_____,;;_(Bignal;;.__,;;":..:r:..,-o/:=;r:..;;,~:...::...~,ntl=..:;;..0-:if/l~ur~)---------­
24. ---~---------------------­
(Signature ofregular reporting amior ff ref)Ort '8 c:oncurrfflt)
U, s. GOYIANMEHT PAINTING OFFICE
16-70109-1