Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

[)~ 241958J •
NAVPERS-310 (REV. 3.54)
-•
REPORT AiTHE FITNESS OF OFFICERS
THE OFFICER REPORTED ON WILL FILL IN THE FIRST ELEVEN SECTIONS:
1. NAME (La,t)
(Fir1t)
(Middle)
2. GRADE
3, USN (R)
4. DESIGNATOR
5. FILE NO.
NEWHOUSE,
Delbert
Clement
cwo
USN
8 11
1
6. SHIP OR STAT ION
7. DATE REPORTED PRESENT DUTY STATION
USS ESSEX
CVA­
10 Januar 1958
8. OCCASION FOR REPORT
9. TYPE OF REPORT
10. PERIOD OF REPORT
SEMI-
□ DETACHMENT OF
[v1
DETACHMENT □
rv:J
CON-
□
□
ANNUAL
REPORTING SENIOR ~ OF OFFICER
REGULAR ~ CURRENT
SPECIAL
FROM 6-1- 8
TO 11- 19- 58
11. DUTIES. Li•t principal dutita a••ioiud including watchta, and lrnlicate in parentheau after each the number of month& durino the reporting period. If auignmem I, In olher than
regular Nal)(J billet or involve, dulio 11ot well tatablj,hf
give outline ofpurpo,e, ,cope, and 11gnificance of ,uch dul1<1. Jf neceHar11, me ,eparate •heet and attach to thu form.
Photo~raphic Officer
\b
Ast OP Division Officer
Senior Air Terminal Unit Duty Officer (6)
FOLLOWING TO BE FILLED IN BY THE REPORTING OFFICER:
Slonature ofofficer reported on:
12. EMPLOYMENT OF COMMAND DURING PERIOD OF THIS REPORT
CV OPS as Unit of TF 60t SIXTHFLT; 1:lESTPAC CV OPS as Unit of CTF 77> SEVENTHFLT.
13. REFERENCE HERE AND APPEND ANY COMMENOABLE OR ADVERSE REPORTS ON THIS OFFICER RECEIVED DURING THE PERIOD OF THIS REPORT
COHSIXTHFLT msg 1610222 of Jul~58 >CNO msg of 30 AuRf58 ;CINCL'\NTFLT msg 1523252 of Octff58.
14. PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES (In campari&on with other officer, of hi• grade and approximate length of ,eroice, conalder the rtguirement, of hi• dutie, and evaluate hi1 performance.)
DUTY ASSIGNMENT
(a) Present Assignment
(b) As
/1.J.r Ter"lllOiw.~tch Officer
(c) Collateral Duties
(d) Technical Specialty rnOt.Of7ranny
(e) Ship Handling
(f) In Administration
(el Ability to Command
(h) As Executive or Division Officer
(I) Duty on a Stall
Ul Other
15. Conshlorlng tho posslblo requirements of
w;ir, lndlcato your ottitudo toward having
tide officer under your com m.ind. Would you:
N
Outstanding per•
Exccllont perform-
Competent and ofil•
Satisfactory per-
0
T
formnnco in most
nnco in most aspects
cient performance
formnnco in most
aspects of his duty
of bis dutai assign-
In most aspects of
aspects of his duty
0
assignments. High-
ments. E cion t or
his duty assign-
nssfgnmonts. Needs
B
ly quBillled.
competent in most
ments. Frequentlr.
some supervision.
s
of the romninlni: as-
demonstrates exce -
BBSICB!ly qualified.
E
poets.
Frequently
lent pcrformnnco.
R
demonstrates out-
V
standing perform-
E
ance.
D
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Inadequate per•
formnnct> in many
aspects of his duty
assignments. Needs
close supervision.
He is not quallt!ed.
(Adverse)
Partlculnrlr
Prefer not
de1lro to
t::7
Prefer h im D
Ba sslaa,ed to 0
Bo 1at1snec1
to hnwo him?
hnvo him?
~
to most?
hnvo him?
to havo him? □
(Advono)
□
16. (a) In comparison with other officers of his erade and approximate length of service, how would you designate this officer?
(b) For this report period Indicate In (b) how many officers of his i:rade you have designated In each category of (a).
Ono of the few highly
A very fine officer of
A dependable and typi-
An accoptable officer
outstnndlni: officora I
groat voluo to the
colly etroctlve ofilcor
know
service
(a)
X
(b)
0
/ 0
I
-
Unsatis!actory
(Adverse)
-
..
17. COMMENTS. In thl! ..ct,on ,t ,. lm~ortant that the outstandmo charactemtic, of the officer, and anv weakneuea which 1trioualv affect hi, performance of dmy, be reported. The
apprai,al should be co11ci,e and concrete m term, of ,pecific exampi,s of performance from which the more oeneral factor, can be inferred. The appral,al will Jualifv the mark, au igned in
items 14, 15, and 16, above. In addition, tlit apprai&al ,hould include oul.!tandir10 quolificotiona in anv field such a• the followmo: adminiitration, planning, logi8tic,, electronic, ntto
weapon,, and in dealing with the public in por,onal or official contact,. Thia apace mu,t not be left blank.
'
Chief Warrant Offi cer NE':.rHOUSE qui etly and unpretentiously has directed the efforts of
the photoP.ranhic group in performing an out standing iob during the Lebanese support
operations. Thousnnds of aerial ohotoR:raohic nrints were expeditiously developed in order
to support intelligence requirements .. He can be depended upon to compl ete any photo­
graphic assignment with speed and expertness.
Chief Warrant Officer NEWHOUSE is well
liked and respected bv all who know and work with him.
He conducts himself in a good
military manner and his apnearance i s always neat and trim. He is recommended for
nromoti on to hirrher rank
18. NAME, GRADE, AND FILE NUMBER OF REPORTING OFFICER. OFFICIAL STATUS RELATIVE TO OFFICER REPORTED ON.
T. A. CHRISTOPHE;1, Captain, 72419, Commnnding Officer
lt-'101011-!