Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

19. In comparison with ·other offlclfrs of hfa trade and;approxtmate tei;ig:{tfof iervfce or approilma'te. length of duty. assignment, to what degree has this officer exhibited
the following qualities?
• • •
• •
• •
• •
(a) PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE (Consider the requirements of his various duty assignments and compare them to his professlonal knowledge.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Has exce~tional knowledge
Has excellent knowledge of
of bis
uty assignments.
most phases of his duty
Extremely well informed.
assignments. Is well In­
formed on the remaining
phases. OcoaslonallY dem­
onstratesexceptlonalknowl­
-.
odge.
,'
'• :
;
~
Is well informod on most
phases of his duty assign­
ments. Frequently demon­
strates excellent knowledge.
Has satisfactory knowledge
of routine phases of his duty
assignments.
Serious gaps in his knowl­
edge of furidamentals of hfs
duty assignments.
(Adverse)
•
.~
..
X,,,
I
' ·-- .. ­
I
.. .
.
..
:
. I
.,
•
(b) COOPERATJON (Consider ablllty and ,wllllngness to work In harmony with and for others.)
;
'.
Promotes harmony in .d~-­
. Gets along well with most
Extremely Bil~ in ·:
_.Indifferent to otliers. .
Incllned to·.creato friction,
NOT OBSERVED ,. workmg· with others. Ras
Ing • with others. A very·
people: • Knows how to take
Cooperates ~ccas1onally.
'Generally nor cooperative.
•
'' '•
-·j
g~ ~
w9rker.·....
an, 'f!1luuriif.staq~Jng _abjllty ~
¾orde~~~ _Fits.~ with at~•.
'.
.,
J.,...•
·□·
crea
ony. • •
(Ad~erse)
...,
, .
...
. '
..
..
:x
•• I
•
I
•
I
(c) JUDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation, think clearly, and develop correct and logical conclusions.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Outstandingly sound and
logical thinker with an
exceptional grasp of the
situation involved.
Exceptionally good Judg­
ment bnsed on sound evalu­
ation of all the factors
~volved.
Judgment Is usually sound
and reasonable.
I ·­
Is .prone to neglect or mis,
interpret facts. Occasion­
ally commits errors In
Judgment.
Due to faulty Judgment, hfs
decisions or recommenda­ ,
tlons are too frequently
wrong.
(Adverse)
•
I
I
X
I
I
•
(d) LEADERSHIP (Consider his ability In organizing, obtaining the cooperation of others, and In directing their efforts effectively.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Outstanding skill In direct-
Ing others results in a very
effective unit. In~lres COD•
fidence even un er very
difllcult circumstances.
A consistently good leader.
Commands respect of his
subordinates. Is very effeo­
tlve under difficult circum­
stances.
Capable leader. Develops
good cooperation and team
work in difficult clroum­
stances. Knows how to give
orders.
Generally obtains effective
cooperation under normal
circumstances.
Falls to command. Unable
to exert control.
(Adverse)
•
I
I
X
I
I
.
(e) PROMOTION POTENTIAL (Consider his capacity to handle jobs of Increased scope and greater responsibility, ability to learn rapidly, personality, self-Improvement
•
efforts, special abilities, and training.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Calrnbleof Increased respon­
slb ·ty and rapid advance­
ment.
Very promising promotional
material.
Demonstrates promise for
further growth at moderate
rate.
Present Job ls taxing his
cspabllltles. Requires con­
slderable amount of training.
Definitely limited.
(Adverse)
•
I
I
X
I
I
•
(f) MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS (Consider his ·utilization of men, money, and materials.)
...... .
~
NOT OBSERVED
□·
.. ..
. .
Ia most effective In the utill­
zation of men, money, and
materials.
Is effective in accomplishing
extra savings In men, mon­
ey, and materials by tmple­
mentfng and maintaining
roved management pro­
~ ures.
Conserves men, money, and
materials effectively by Im­
fii
ementfng and, maintain•
g routine management
procedures.
Utlllzes men, money, and
materials in a barely satis­
factory manner.
Is needlessly wasteful of
~en~~!s~~: m:iterla~
regard. (Adverse)
•
I
X
I
I
I
•
(g) REMARKS. Marks In any of the starred <-> boxes must be Justified In this section with a brief description of the factors which were considered In evaluating the
officer. The justification should be In concrete and specific terms.
.
Not applicable
20. State your estimate of this officer's capacity for original and constructive professional work and Indicate to what degree his performance during this reporting
period has reflected that capacity. State concrete attainments wherever possible.
If not observed, so state.
·
:CWO....NEWHOUSE.has:. demonstrated ability for constructive professional work by the
efflcient-·manner· -in-which he reorganized the recorda of the Material Department.
He
,demonst.rated~- planning ability and initiative in screening and obtaining disposition
'instructions· for on hand material no longer needed by this Connnand.
21. (a) As a general rule, officers should not be shown their fitness reports by the reporting seniors unless the report contains adverse matter. An adverse report
must be referred for statement pursuant to Article 1701-(8) Navy Regu~atlons.
His statement should be attached to'thl~ report_.
. .,,.
(Signaturs ofrer,Ular refJOl'tfng aenior if report ta concurrent)
b Has the officer re ort d on seen this report? .
24..............--~-.,----,,,-----------......---,.-------
U, G, GOVERNKINT PRIIITING OPflCC
J0-7010D-l