John Company

Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957

DOW-UAP-D104 · page 536 of 585

Page 536 of 585 of DOW-UAP-D104

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

19: In c~mparlson with other officers of his grade and approximate length of service or approximate len~h of duty assignment to what degree has this officer exhibited
the followlng qualities?
'
(a) PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE (Consider the requirements of his various duty assignments and compare them to his professional knowledge.)
Hns exceptional ln1owlodge
HllS excellent knowledge of
Is well informed on most
Has sntislactory h,1owledgo
Serious gnps in his h,iowl­
. NOT OBSERVED
of his duty assignments.
most phases ol bis duty
pbnses ol bis duty assign­
ol routine phases ol bis duty
edgo ol lundnmcutnls ol his
Extremely well informed.
assignments. Is well in­
ments. Frequently demon­
nssignmouts.
duty assignments.
formed on the remaining
strates excellent knowledge.
□
phnscs. Occasionally dem­
(Adverse)
onstrates exceptional knowl­
edge.
(b) COOPERATION (Consider ability and wllllngness to work In harmony with and for others.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Extremely successful in
working with others. Has
an outstanding ability to
crente hnrmou y.
Promotes harmony in deal­
ing with others. A very
good team worker.
Gets along well with most
people. Knows how to ta,J<o
orders. Fits in witha team.
IndlfTorent to others.
Cooperates occasionally.
Inclined to create friction.
Generally not cooperative.
(Adverse)
(c) J UDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation, think clearly, and develop correct and loElcal conclusions.)
NOT OBSERVED
[XI
Outstandingly sound nnd
logicnl tbiJ1ker with an
oxceptional grasp or the
situation involved.
Exceptionally good Judg­
ment based on sound ovalu­
ntion or nu thefactors
involved.
Judgment is usually sound
nnd reasonable.
Is prono to neglect or mis­
in tcrprct !nets. Occnsion­
al!y commits errors in
Judgment.
Duo to faulty Judgment, bis
decisions or rccommcnt.la•
tions aro too frequently
wrong.
(Ad,crso)
(d) LEADERSHIP (Consider his ability In organizing, obtaining the cooperation of others, and In directing their efforts effectively.)
NOT OBSERVED
rn
Outstanding skill in direct­
ing others results in a very
efTcctive unit. Inspires con­
fldenco oven under very
di.!Ilcult circumstances.
A consistently good loader.
Commands respect or his
subordinates. Is very cITcc­
tivo under difficult circum­
stances.
Capnblo leader. Do,·clops
good cooperation and team
work in difficult circum­
stances. Knows bow to givo
orders.
Gcnerolly obtains cITcctivo
cooporotion under normal
circumstances.
Fails to command. Unable
to exert control.
(Adverse)
(e) PROMOTION POTENTIAL (Consider his capacity to handle Jobs of Increased scope and greater responsibility, ability to learn rapidly, personality, self-Improvement
efforts, special abllltles, and training.)
NOT OBSERVED
[XI
Capable of increased respon­
sibility and rapid advance­
ment.
V crypromising promotional
matcrinl.
Demonstrates promise !or
rurtber growth at modcmto
rate.
Present Job is taxing his
capnbilities. Requires eon­
sidcmblc nmow1t of training.
Definitely limited.
(Adverse)
, NOT OBSERVED
~
Is most eITectivc in tbo utili­
zation of men, money, and
materials.
Is efTectivo in accomplishing
extra savings iu men, mon­
ey, and materials by imp!o­
monting nud maintaining
improved management pro­
cedures.
Conscn·cs men, money, rmd
materials cITectively by im­
plementing and maintain­
ing routino manngcment
procedures.
Utilizes men, money, and
materials in n barely satis­
factory mnnnor.
Is needlessly wasteful of
men, money, nntl materials.
Is irresponsible
in this
regard.
(Adverse)
(f) MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS (Consider his utilization of men, money, and materials.)
(E) REMARKS. Marks In any of the starred (•) boxes must be Justified In this section with a brief description of the factors which were considered in evaluating the
officer. The Justification should be In concrete and specific terms.
20. State your estimate of this officer's capacity for original and constructive professional work and Indicate to what degree his performance during this reporting
period has reflected that capacity. State concrete attainments wherever possible.
If not observed, so state.
NOi' OBSERVED.
21 . (a) As a general rule, officers should not be shown their fitness reports by the reporting seniors unless the report contains adverse matter. An adverse report
must be referred for statement pursuant to Article 1701-(8) Navy Regulations.
His statement should be attached tcrthlsTeport.
(b) Has the officer reported on seen this report?
YES □
22. oATE FoRwARDED _
_1_6_ A_u_gu~_st__l_9_5_4_____
24. ----------------,--,-,----,-,----...,---
- -­
(Sionature of regular reportino senior if report is concurrent)
U. S. COVERHMCNT PRINTI NG OFFI CE
10-70100- 1 •