Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

•
s ...P17 ,~'.,;4
I{
v
•
•
NAYPERS•310 (REY, 3- 54)
.. REPORT ON THE FITNESS OF OFFICERS
THE OFFICER REPORTED ON WILL FILL IN THE FIRST ELEVEN SECTIONS:
1. NAME (La.11)
(Firat)
(Middle)
2. GRADE
3. USN (R)
4. DESIGNATOR
5. FILE NO.
NEWHOUSE
Del bert
Clement
CHPHOI'
USN
8310
177283
6 . SHIP OR STATION
8. OCCASIOfl FOR REPORT
9. TYPE OF REPORT
SEMI-
□ DETACHMENT OF
fvl
DETACHMENT □
fvl CON·
□
□
ANNUAL
REPORTING SENIOR LAI
OF OFFICER
REGULAR ~J CURRENT
SPECIAL
7. DATE REPORTED PRESENT DUTY STATION
7- 2-54
10. PERIOD OF REPORT
FROM 6-12-54
TO
8-1.3-54
I.eave and t ransit 6- 12- 54 to 7- 2-54
Sionalure of of[mr report,d on:
FOLLOWING TO BE FILLED IN BY THE REPORTING OFFICER:
12. EMPLOYMENT OF COMMAND DURING PERIOD OF THIS REPORT
'General ut i lity servi ces, VlESPAC area.
13. REFEREUCE HERE AND APPEND ANY COMMENDABLE OR ADVERSE REPORTS ON THIS OFFICER RECEIVED DURING T HE PERIOD OF THIS REPORT
None.
14. PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES (fa compari,on with other officer• of hi> orade and approximate lenoth of ,ervice, con,ider the requirement• of hi• dutie, and eval uate hi• performanu.)
DUTY ASSIGNMENT
(a) Present Assignment
(b) As
::sguactron
Watch Officer
(c) Collateral Duties
(d) T echnical Specialty t'notogr aQh'
(e) Ship Handling
(f) In Administration
(g) Ability to Command
(h) As Executive or Division Officer
(i)
Duty on a Staff
U> Other
N
Outstan d ing p or -
Excollcnt perform-
Competent nnd cm-
Satisfactory per-
0
T
Cormnnco in most
anco in most aspects
cient performance
formanco in most
aspects of bis duty
of his duty assign-
in most aspects of
aspects of bis duty
0
assignments. H igh-
ments. Efficient or
his duty assign-
assignments._]'<ceds
D
ly qualifiod.
competent in most
ments. Frequently
some supcrv1s1on.
s
or tho remaining !IS-
demonstrates oxcel-
Dnsicnlly qualified.
E
pects.
F requently
lent performance.
R
demonstrates out-
V
standini: perform-
E
anco.
D
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
I nadequate per-
formnnco in many
aspects of bis duty
assignments. N eeds
close supervision.
Ho is not qualified.
(~dverso)
15. Considering tho posstblo requirements of
P:1rttcul.1rly
Prefer not
Wilr, lndlc:itc your ntt1ludo toward having
desire to
Prefer him D
Bo pleased to rQ
Bo s-ntlsRed
to h.JVO him ?
this officer under your command. Would you:
h:i.vo him?
□
to most?
havo him?
L...:9-
to ha ve him? □
( Advorso)
□
16. (a) In comparison with other officers of his grade and approximate length of service, how would you designate this officer?
(b) For t his report period Indicate In (b) how many officers of his grade you have designated In each category of (a) .
Ono of tho few highly
A very fine officer of
A dependable and typl-
An acceptable officer
outstanding officers I
great value to t ho
cally oticctive officer
!mow
scrvica
(a)
y
(b)
1
1
1
Unsatisfactory
(Adverse)
c;vp
V
17. COM MENTS. I n this s,ct,on ,t 13 imiiortant that th, outstandmo charactemtrc, of the officer, and anv w,aknesse, which smou,lv affect hi, performanu of dutv, be reported. Tho
apprai, al should b, conrise and conc'.ett 111 term• of~picijic aa,~ple, ofperform~nct fro"! whi_ch th~ more urn,ralfactor, can be inferred. Th_e ap1!ral6al will_ju,tifv. lht mark• assionod in
items 14, 15, and JG, above. I n addition, the appraisal sl,ould mcludt 011tstandmo quali}icat,ons m anv field such a, /ht f ollowmo: admttnstration, plannmo, loo1stic, electronic, ,1,w
weapons, and in dealino with tho public i n personal or official contact,. '.l'hi, space must not be loft blan/;.
'
'
Due to the short per i od of time CHPHOI' NEWHOUSE ha s been atta ched to this command, t his
r eport i s m1bmitted pri maril y f or recor d Qurposes. His at t i t ude i s excellent and it is
bel ieved be wi l l be a valuabl e asset t o this sQuadron.
18. NAME, GRADE, AND FILE NUMBER OF REPORTING OFFICER. OFFICIAL STATUS RELATIVE TO OFFICER REPORTED ON.
J . P . BARRON, CDR, 0 85247/1310, USN.
Commanding Of ficer.
16---70101>--l