Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957
DOW-UAP-D104 · page 555 of 585
Text
A machine read this text from the scan. A second reading only partly agreed with it, so it may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
1. NAME (last) (first) (middle) RANK AND CLASSIFICATION FILE NO. NEWHOUSE Delbert Clement CHPHOT 8311 177283 SHIP OR STATION PERIOD OF REPORT (mo., day, year) U.S. Naval Photographic Center, NAS, Anacostia, D. C. DATE FROM DATE TO 7-1-50 10-31-50 DATE OF REPORTING TO PRESENT SHIP OR STATION OCCASION FOR REPORT 1-1-50 DETACHMENT OF DETACHMENT OF REGULAR OFFICER REPORTED ON REPORTING SENIOR SEMI-ANNUAL QUARTERLY SPECIAL 2. DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES SINCE LAST FITNESS REPORT (List most recent Arst and describe accurately. Include periods of leave, transit, etc., also FROM TO Include employment of ship.) MO. YR. MO. YR. Head Black & White Production Section 7 50 10 50 Member Examining Board 7 50 10 50 Ten (10) days annual leave (10-3-50 to 10-13-50) 10 50 10 50 Has present duty changed since last Atness report was submitted? Yes No 3. IF COURSES OF INSTRUCTION WERE COMPLETED DURING PERIOD OF THIS REPORT. LIST TITLE OF COURSE, LOCATION OF SCHOOL, Are you physically qualified LENGTH OF COURSE AND DATE COMPLETED. for Sea Duty Don't None X Yes No Know 4. If Aviator, Indicate No. of TOTAL Flight Hours Last Two years TYPE OF AIRCRAFT for Each Type Aircraft (List Most Recent Type First) NO. OF HOURS Non Aviator 5. MY PREFERENCE SEA FOR NEXT DUTY KIND OF DUTY Photographic LOCATION Pacific Fleet Air Unit IS: SHORE KIND OF DUTY Photographic LOCATION NAS, Barbers Point, T.H. 6. SECTIONS 6 THROUGH 12 TO BE NAME OF REPORTING OFFICER RANK FILE NO. OFFICIAL STATUS RELATIVE TO OFFICER REPORTED ON FILLED IN BY REPORTING OFFICER L. W. PARRISH, CDR, 71432 Commanding Officer IS THIS OFFICER QUALIFIED TO PER- INDICATE MORE RESPONSIBLE DUTIES FOR WHICH HE IS IN TRAINING. (If none, $0 state) DATE OF EXPECTED QUALIFICATION FORM ALL HIS PRESENT DUTIES? YES NO Material Officer Now APPRAISAL FOR DETAIL PURPOSES Comment on special or outstanding qualifications as well as any physical defects. which should be considered In determining the kinds of duty to which he should be detailed. Only comments on qualifications significant in detailing should be entered here. ANY COMMENTS BEGARDING FITNESS FOR PROMOTION SHOULD BE ENTERED IN SECTION 12 ONLY OF PAGE 1. Qualified by past duties as Photographic Technical Liaison Officer with other Departments of the Armed Forces and is qualified in photographic supply and material duties. FOR WHAT DUTIES IS HE RECOMMENDED? ASHORE Photographic AFLOAT Photographic 7. FOR EACH FACTOR OBSERVED CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX TO INDICATE HOW THE OFFICER COMPARES WITH ALL OTHERS OF THE SAME RANK, CLASSIFICA- TION AND CORPS WHOSE PROFESSIONAL ABILITIES ARE KNOWN TO YOU PERSONALLY DO NOT LIMIT THIS COMPARISON ONLY TO THE OTHERS NOW UNDER YOUR COMMAND. DO NOT HESITATE TO MARK "NOT OBSERVED" ON ANY QUALITY WHEN APPROPRIATE NO ENTRY WHICH IS MADE IN THIS SECTION WILL BE CONSIDERED AN UNSATISFACTORY REPORT WHICH MUST BE REFERRED TO THE OFFICER FOR STATEMENT. ONLY ENTRIES DESIGNATED IN SECTIONS 8, 9, 11 AND 12 WILL BE SO CONSIDERED. Within Within Within Not Within Within RATING FACTORS Bottem Next Middle Observed Next Top Top 10% 20% 40% 20% 10% A. SEA OR ADVANCE BASE DUTY 1. STANDING DECK WATCHES UNDERWAY X How does this offleer compare In: 2. ABILITY TO COMMAND! X NOTE: ITEM (A3) TO BE MARKED FOR ALL OFFI- 3. PERFORMANCE IN PRESENT DUTIES AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 2, ABOVE? X CERS. 4. REACTIONS DURING EMERGENCIES? X 5. PERFORMANCE AT BATTLE STATION OR IN BATTLE DUTIES? X B. INITIATIVE AND 1. ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY WHEN SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS ARE LACKING! X RESPONSIBILITY 2. GIVE FRANK OPINIONS WHEN ASKED OR VOLUNTEER THEM WHEN NECESSARY TO AVOID MISTAKES? X How well does this officer: 3. FOLLOW THROUGH DESPITE OBSTACLES IN CARRYING OUT RESPONSIBILITIES ASSIGNED OR ASSUMED? 1. UNDERSTAND INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN, AND USE SUGGESTIONS OFFERED! X C. UNDERSTANDING AND SKILL 2. EXERCISE JUDGMENT? How well does this officer: S. RATE IN TECHNICAL COMPETENCE IN HIS SPECIALTY, IF ANY? (Name Specialty) 1. INSPIRE SUBORDINATES TO WORK TO THE MAXIMUM OF THEIR CAPACITY! 2. EFFECTIVELY DELEGATE TASKS AND AUTHORITY? X D. LEADERSHIP 3. TRANSMIT ORDERS, INSTRUCTIONS, AND PLANS? How well does this officer: 4. ORGANIZE HIS WORK AND THAT OF THOSE UNDER HIS COMMAND OR SUPERVISION! X 5. MAINTAIN DISCIPLINE AMONG THOSE UNDER HIS COMMAND OR DIRECTION? X 1. ABILITY TO WORK WITH OTHERS! E. CONDUCT AND WORK HABITS X 2. ABILITY TO ADAPT TO CHANGING NEEDS AND CONDITIONS? How does this officer compare In: X 3. MILITARY CONDUCT-BEARING, DRESS, COURTESY, ETC. X 8. INDICATE YOUR ATTITUDE TOWARD (Check one) HAVING THIS OFFICER UNDER YOUR DEFINITELY NOT PREFER NOT COMMAND, WOULD YOU: WANT HIM? TO HAVE HIM? BE SATISFIED BE PLEASED PARTICULARLY (UNSATISFACTORY) (UNSATISFACTORY) TO HAVE HIM? TO HAVE HIM? DESIRE HIM? 9a. Considering All Officers of the Same Rank, (Check one) Classification and Corps, Whose Professional UNDER NO IF $0% WERE IF 70% WERE 9b. How many Officers are Included in the Abilities Are Known to You Personally, IF 30% WERE CIRCUMSTANCES IF ONLY 10% TO BE Would You Promote Him: TO BE group used for the comparison in 9a. TO BE WERE TO BE (Unsatisfactory) PROMOTED? 10 OR PROMOTED? 10 TO OVER PROMOTED! PROMOTED? 10. COMMENT IN SECTION 12 AND GIVE REFERENCE HERE TO ANY COMMENDABLE OR ADVERSE REPORTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE ON THE OFFICER LESS DURING 50 THIS PERIOD 50 11. HAVE YOU ANY ADVERSE COMMENTS TO MAKE REGARDING THIS OFFICER'S QUALITIES OR PERFORMANCE? YES X NO HAS HE ANY MENTAL OR MORAL WEAKNESS WHICH ADVERSELY AFFECTS If yes, explain UNSATISFACTORY. Yes in either Item of Section 11 HIS EFFICIENCY? YES X NO in Section 12. constitutes an unsatisfactory report and must be referred to the officer for statement. 12. Give ments in of this unsatisfactory space a clear, performance, concise appraisal ability, of character, the officer or reported conduct must on and be his referred performance to the officer of duty, for including statement. any Statements worthy of special of mention. Include recommendations as to promotion. Any state- qualifications do not constitute an unsatisfactory report. For example: "This officer was a little slow in getting started but is a now constructive making good nature progress" which refer "This to minor officer imperfections or lack of present duties but has had no experience at sea" would not be unsatisfactory in nature. or 18 well qualified in bie Check one of these boxes - ) CONSIDER THIS REPORT TO BE SATISFACTORY UNFAVORABLE UNSATISFACTORY CHPHOT NEWHOUSE is an especially capable loyal and conscientious technical officer, particularly well qualified in administrative duties. During the period of this report CHPHOT NEWHOUSE has performed his duties in an outstanding manner. He is qualified now DO NOT LEAVE BLANK and is strongly recommended for return to his former temporary commissioned rank as Lieutenant. (If additional space Is needed attach extra sheet) SIGNATURE OF REPORTING OFFICER SIGNATURE D.Shewhouse OF OFFICER REPORTED ON (Applies only to Sections I through 5) Has this report been shown or referred to X Yes officer reported on? L. W. PARRISH, CDR, USN No When completed remove carbon paper, forward Pages 1 and 2, not detached, to BuPers. Retain Page 3 for "Officer's Qualification Record Jacket". PAGE I