John Company

U.S. Air Force Flying Discs File, 1952

DOW-UAP-D105 · page 228 of 253

Page 228 of 253 of DOW-UAP-D105

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

,
'
{ft@8Cfietedj Movie J'ilm of 1'l,1ina Objects Taken
2 Jul 52, Vicinity of Tremonton., Utah
Chief, Air Teehnical
Dept ot the Air 1"01·ce
Intelliience Center
liq USAJ' - AJ'Ollf-2A2
Maj Fournet/fb./
Wris'bt-Patterson JiJ'B
71016
1 .
Subject film, received. thin of'f'ice 5 Sep 5~, 1G 11'.i.Closed tor appropr iate
action.
Du:pl.icate of report submitted by the photographer, CPO Delbert c. Jrewhouse
(177283, UBI) , is inclosed for your 1.n:f'ormation in the event that the copy forwarded
to you by tbe IG, Hill AFB, Uteh hAs not been received.
4
2 .
A messaae was d.1spo:tclled to the CG, WADP' on 6 Sep 52, with info1.•mation copy
to you, requestina that an intelligence officer interview CPO liewhouse and. determine
ad.ditional. detai1e or the si&t>.tin., 1.t' available•
.
3 .
A mcssa&e was also dispatched to the co, Rill AFB, Utah requeatin& weather
1nformntion for thP. ~riod and vici nity in question. An information Cc:JflY was
dispatched to you.
4. It has been ascertained i'rom the •aTal Observatory, Washln&ton, D.C. that
the position o-t the sun at the -f.Lac(L..iliJZ hours., 2 July ~) and the 1.oeo.tion
(4145B - 11210W) in question was 64.:;P cle..-ation and l3l. azimut.b.
5. ~eat the film be submitted to the WADC Photo Lab tor complete analysis
as soon as possible.
The :f'ollovins are suacested quest1ona for this analysis which,
if' answered, shou1d facilitate evaluation or the incident:
4
a .
Are 1.maaes made by lie;ht source or reflection?
;, P· Aey indication of what kind or objects could have caused imaaes? Is
tbere ~
bird sufficiently actinic to cause µia.ees? CouJ.d they have been caused
by air craft or bOlloons?
c .
What causes impression that some objects at times ap_pear to become 2 or
1
3 where there was ori~~ one, or, converse:cy-, 2. or 3 object• at times a,ppear to
merge into one.
(
d ,
Do all. objects have same cha.ra.ct~1cs?
1
(l) Same apparent shape?
x~0 r; JtTI e,
(2) Same col.or?
·
1
,
(
1£
(3) Same relative size?
t.j/3 S,3 ~
'/~x­
i
(4) Same general. motion?
'
e. What ere shape(o), color(s) end relative &iz.e(s) of objects?
f .
To what can the .,tede-in" nnd "fade-out" of' th.e objects be attributed?
1
/1
, S •
What type motion is attributable to the objects (about theil' QVIl axis
as :well as o.bout axis of fllaht path)?
~ 1'-
J.
i . I h . Is there ~
accellere.ti9n f'Vident 1n their motion ~ns ,.1.111,.:1""'1t i>f., axis?
,~ 'f~
, 1. Can the motion 01· the camera (paM.ina and Jo,sU:nc} e •u •c:n-.. ?or~
I
~ v'~ A eo
l
n ,
~ 'S-tJ~
~
.-'
~~ !::•. 1, ;.;....,.._. .
ll 11:~lla
~ &, G,~
~4'
SECURITY lNF0ID.!AXION
:--.--~
~