AAWSAP DIRD, Anomalous Acute and Subacute Field Effects on Human Biological Tissues, March 2010

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

UNCLASSIFIED/,'FOR: OFFIOIAL 1.tSE o••tlf
•
Beau's lines on fingernails
•
Absent serum enzymes and CBC findings
•
30-60 day subacute persistent sleep disorder, dysphagia
•
Parasthesiae (can last up to 3 years, and thus become chronic)
It is particularly important to note that one can do a semi-quantitative dose-response
determination of apparent anomalous events, by comparing the clinical reports, with
what we know from the literature...at least as a first approximation of what one may
adduce the power system effects at near field may have been. For example, from the
peer-reviewed medical literature one can find cases inclusive of about a dozen patients
and subjects exposed to one to ten minutes RF [HF through EHF] (of the '100s
mentioned above):
•
<10 mW/cm 2 @ UHF-SHF = no effects [27]
•
>50<100 mW/cm 2 @ UHF-SHF = as above [28]
•
<50 mW/cm 2 (2.45 GHz) UHF-SHF (presumed) radial neuropathy and dyasthesia:
20 months duration, intermittent electromyography changes, multiple sensory
neuropathy [25,29]
•
>250 W/m 2 @ HF (20-30 MHz) impaired 2-pt discrimination x
•
<1 mW/cm2 (presumed)@ UHF (2140 MHz) double-blind/ cross-over study in
adolescents and adults: no neurological or cognitive signs and symptoms [30, and
Figure Two vide infra]
B. THE ENIGMA OF "NON-THERMAL" WHEALS AND LOCALIZED
"BURNS"
An observation made often, in the literature of aerospace related reports of anomalous
object after-effects, clinically valid, but not linked to any observed heating effect, is the
appearance of what appear to be 1-3 cm localized circumscribed erythematous,
occasionally gangrenous, and sub-dermal wheals, boils, and serosanguinous abrasions.
These injuries appear concomitantly with what are otherwise felt to be burns from
microwave or other RF injuries, except they are often found on clothed parts of the
body, at a distance from the worst second degree burns. And, dermatologically, they
can't be diagnosed as thermal or RF-related injuries.
A recent publication from the Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint
Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna and Tashkent Russia; Faculty of Physics,
Tashkent; and the Institut fur Physik, Rostock, may offer some first notions of an
underlying pathophysiological mechanism. The study is said to be theoretical, but based
on experimental data, and appears to be unrelated to any emitter concerns, RF or
otherwise, and is not linked to an aerospace application, although funded by a
x Note: the wavelength of this exposure would have been on the order of 10-50 km; in the previous UHF-SHF
injuries, they would have been 1 cm - 1 dm; given equal incident energy dermal penetration is inversely
proportional to wavelength. A companion study is attempting to further quantify these relationships, to permit
additional inferences as to putative energy sources of anomalous events.
UNCLASSIFIED/fFOA OFFIQIAL: Wili QP◄IL:¥
11