John Company

AAWSAP DIRD, Laser Lightcraft Nanosatellites, November 2010

DOW-UAP-D143 · page 38 of 77

Page 38 of 77 of DOW-UAP-D143

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

UNCLASSIFIED/;'POR: OPPICIAL USE 014Lf
system, like the air-to-air one, has reduced capability if an enemy can achieve nearly
simultaneous arrival times for all of its ballistic missiles. If so, then a Lightcraft BMD
system would have to serve as an adjunct to other BMD systems, such as the ground­
based PAC-3 Patriot, THAADS, or NMD which are deployed for national or theater
ballist ic missile defense. However, this system could protect regions against limited
ballistic missile attacks at the earliest phase of hostilities before ground-based BMD
systems cou ld arrive and be deployed.
Table 4. Influence of Target Velocity and Intercept Angle on Impact Energy
and Required Mass [261.
Lightcraft
Intercept
Velocity
Lightcraft
Intercept
Aspect
Impact
Energy
and
Weight
Ballistic Missile Threat
-SRBM--IRBM--ICBM­
R~l000 km
R~2500km R~l0,000 km
V=l km/s
V=4 km/s
V=6km/s
0° from
Impact E for
1.0 kg Wt.
25MJ
49MJ
81 MJ
Bead-on
Collision
Wt for 10
MJofE
.40kg
.20 kg
.12 kg
30° from
Impact E for
1.0 kg Wt.
21 MJ
44MJ
74MJ
3 km/s
Bead-on
Collision
Wt. For 10
MJofE
.47 kg
.23 kg
.14 kg
45° from
Bead-on
Collision
Impact E for
1.0 kg Wt.
17MJ
37MJ
66MJ
Wt. for 10
MJofE
.59 kg
.27kg
.15 kg
UNCLASSIFIED,'fFOA QFFISIAL 1!181!! 8HLY
34