AAWSAP DIRD, Quantum Tomography of Negative Energy States in the Vacuum, January 2011
DOW-UAP-D153 · page 38 of 51
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR AEEICIAk W&li 8,.L1/ drawback of this approach is that it reveals information about the quantum state only within the sideband chosen for the measurement. Therefore, the method is incompatible with other techniques for characterizing a quantum state for which such precise selection of spectral modes is impossible. Time-domain BHD resolves this limitation. Hansen et al. [4] describe their experimental time-domain BHD device. They developed a pulsed BHD for precise measurement of the electric field quadratures of pulsed optical quantum states. A high level of common mode suppression(> 85 dB) and low electronic noise (730 electrons per pulse) in their device provides a signal-to noise ratio of 14 dB for measurement of the quantum noise of individual pulses. Their device achieved a signal-to-noise ratio of 14 dB at a pulse repetition rate of up to 1 MHz, enabling high-accuracy quantum measurements to be carried out in a short time. They performed a quantum tomography of the coherent state as a test for their device, and the Wigner function and density matrix were reconstructed with 99.5% fidelity while their detector exhibited 91 % quantum efficiency. Their detection system can also be used for ultrasensitive balanced detection in continuous wave mode. Figure 13 shows a schematic of their time-domain BHD. The figure shows two polarizing beam splitter (PBS) cubes, a 50:50 beam splitter (BS), two half-wave plates (A/2), two photodiodes (left-side in dotted box), and the signal processing electronics inside the dotted box. ;-·---·---·------·---·---·---·--- ·---·--- ·------ ·· I I lo~ pass ilter I I ------------------------------------·-- Figure 13. Time-Domain Balanced Homodyne Detector. (courtesy of P. Lodahl) As we discussed previously in Sections IIIB-4 and IIIB-5, to perform BHD one overlaps on a beam splitter the electromagnetic wave whose quantum state is to be measured and a relatively strong LO wave in the matching optical mode. The two fields emerging from the beam splitter are incident upon two high efficiency photodiodes whose output photocurrents are subtracted. The photocurrent difference is proportional to the value of the electric field operator E in the signal mode, where 8 is the relative optical 0 phase of the signal and the LO. In traditional frequency-domain BHD, one uses a certain frequency component of the difference signal to determine the quadrature quantum noise of the optical state. The measurement frequency is normally chosen to be approximately 5 to 10 MHz where the technical noise is minimized. Figure 14 shows an example of experimentally measured data for a typical (undisturbed) vacuum state and a squeezed vacuum state using a time-domain BHD system. UNCLASSIFIED// FOR OFFICIAL U.!r:: er•t' 34