Astronaut Scientific Debriefings, 1962-1963
NASA-UAP-D015 · page 140 of 216
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
26 Schirra - Correct, that's when I came into it. O'Keefe - What was the height of the layers at this time 66 kilometers, is that right? Schirra - Right, that's what I was saying. I hope we can hold Mercury meaning that I'd like to see it· go through this and I did not know that I could, but obviously I proved that I could; I did. This was quite a surprise. Didn~t you say, Jocelyn, that there aren't many people that have seen Mercury sets? Gill - Very true . Mercury, (the planet) · period . Very f ew people know that it exists. O'Keefe - Can I point out that you used the word· airglow just in general terms, a faint, glowing light seen· from the· atmosphere without your - What you called the airglow is not what is technically know as the airglow. Schirra - Yes, any time we use airglow I don't use it as we professionally talk about airglow. I was using it merely as an escape clause. Dunkelman - There is one other point there. One isn't sure just in what plane these phenomena took place . They may have been ahead or behind this plane (of the spacecraft). We have to think of this ... The 66 kilometers might indeed be reflected as something that had been before this point, you see. Nordberg - (Comment inaudible). Schirra ~ My local vertical would be this hand as I show it and, of course, 40 degrees to the left where the sun and