Astronaut Scientific Debriefings, 1962-1963
NASA-UAP-D015 · page 162 of 216
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
48 than beat this any further, it's circumbent on us to go to the planetarium and really nail this down. All I have to do is just take this window box we have and just move it around and - ah ha there it is. • ·ounkeiman - Something we would like to know is the dimming eff ect . Schirra - Uh huh. Dunkelman - You say that this patch was quite bright, that's one t hi ng> and then was it quite bright because it appeared bright or because there are many, many fewer stars. This is the question we have to answer . Schirra - Right. You know what went through my mind when · I f inally realized what I was looking at? I was livid about the fact that I had the periscope. Absolutely livid, because· I would have shot up a whole roll of film right on that (using uv spectrograph). (Laughter) I was fighting for that thing and that's why you can look · through and I make perisocpe sound like a dirty word. All through here the wor d periscope is shortened to four letters practically. (Laughter) Shoemaker - Why don't we go on. Jocelyn, why don't you get together with Cdr . Schirra and write a conclusion on this. Schirra ~ We'll set up a rendezvous here. Shoemaker - I think we have covered quite a few of the remainder· of the questions partly in discussion. I would like to go back to' dark adaptation here which is the next question. You have talked about i t and let's see whether there are any points that we havenJt • covered . The question is would you tell us when you think you were best dark-adapted? Was there any time during flight when you employed only red light in the