Astronaut Scientific Debriefings, 1962-1963
NASA-UAP-D015 · page 168 of 216
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
54 it on. I think they are trying to trace that through. It wasn't Aldebaran, that ' s for sure. • Dubin - You say that you never saw your fluorescent numbers on your watch? Schirra - No, I did not. This bothered me . Dub in - Did you look at it? Schi rra - Yes . Dunke l man - Is this some watch that requires exposure to li ght f or awhi le? Schi rra - Correct. There is another answer to th i s. The time function, meaning just running time, has th e fluorescent, but the elapsed time that I used on this watch i s just black and whi te. I wanted badly to get at least the hands coated and this i s a r eal chore . Very few people do this for you. I would have liked very much to have had this done, but couldn't ·get it. DUnkeJman - I would sure like to see the CIC lighting people have a chance to put their two cents into this who l e thing about the lights, for Apollo or something like that. Schirra - I have gone on record saying that Gemini will -not f l y until I personally run a lighting mockup on that vehicle as we l l as on Apollo . There are many people who know how strongly I f eel on t his subject. Gill _- Very good . Very good. Schi rra - What I ' m getting at is, if you can get the light out of the vehicle, you don't need to spend a lot of time adapting. Gill - Right.