Astronaut Scientific Debriefings, 1962-1963
NASA-UAP-D015 · page 181 of 216
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
67 opportunity to see a highway, for example, and trace it, because I wasn't over those populated areas such as the Southern United States long enough or had the clear weather to just sit there and observe them. In contrast, I think what you would do if you saw something and wanted to look at it, I think what you would do is that you would pitch down more - to look almost straight down and see it which Scott had the capability of doing and he could really take a careful look at it. O'Keefe - One curious fact that I haven't seen anybody take advantage of is this. It is quite common in triangulation that two stations which are a couple of hundred miles apart, or a hundred miles apart, and that therefore as far apart as you are from the ground and along a light path which is much inferior it's nearly parallel to the earth. In order for one of those stations to see the other one - to measure on it - they provide one of them with a 6-inch heliotrope, that's enough. That means that somebody on the ground with a six-inch heliotrope who knew how to point could point a light that you could see even in the daytime if they had a dark background; and conversely, if you had a heliotrope, you could also be seen from the ground. I have never seen this possibility discussed. Of course it also goes with the fact that instead of these tremendous flares, if they knew how to point, they could make a much stronger light where you are with a search light. Schirra - Sure . . .. O' Keefe - The army 5- foot searchlight gives 800 million candles