Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part I, 1965

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

€O ►~FIDEt4Tl~L
I had suspected they were doing when we launched-­
why we had unbal anced stack readings.
1-A read
6
amps, 1-B read 10 , 1-C read 11. This accounts
for your high reading on Stack 1.
2-A
was
6,
2-B was 6, , and 2-C was 6. . Ttis was the way
they were reading.
I ran through a check on them
when we were actually in the booster phase.
So
that is why I felt the reading wasn ' t bad.
They
were both reading about 23 1/2 or 24 volts .
They
looked pretty good.
I got my 2-1 update.
I got the t:N of 167, 6T of
3+35, and GMT to retro command of 14 48 34. I have
the other times too. The time to 400 000 was 2+18,
as read up to me and the time to reverse bank
angle was 8+47. This is what we wrote down .
This is one time I remember now when I was a little
irritated, because they gave times to us in a
manner in which I hadn 't wanted them toe They
were supposed to give elapsed time but they gave
it to us in GMT time for our retro. We had asked
them to give it to us in elapsed, They came right
back up and gave it to us both ways.
I remember
writing it down twice, on the elapsed time of
01 32 35.
I can see why they did it because it