Gemini 4 Experiment Debriefing, 1967
NASA-UAP-D018 · page 102 of 224
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
Belt l8 .2 over the place . It follows, then, if you switch that , I mean the next time is ter ical and the next time was great .......... . that if you could get out in the spacecraft at night, ...... . You ' d sec a l ot more . You say it ' s "great " because you saw 7th ma.gn • tude :-itars, l'.,1i t Ed and I oth proved th t w_ could see more stars .Lyt11p; in an airplane at 40,000 feet here on earth than we could up there . But Lhen if you want t o l ook at the diagolect ric exampl e, which is p:eomeLrical y ext nded ob ec L--you ' re l ooking through this little narrow an,lc r estriction wher .as if you ' d ·gone outside you could see this clong~Led phenomenon with ease--the same with l ooking at meteors .... You ' r e making some conclusions right now that we 're not--haven'.t made- nor making . Well I 'm t r ying t o get your impressi on as to whether- And I ' m not sur e before when you were t al king about the dayglow of what conclusion you drew from what I said . Are you t rying t o imply Lhat ther e ' s a differenc be lMeen a night sky and a day sky which 11.r 01>vio1Jsl.y ..•..... or b tween the slcy and the ground in the <layt: i rr11' ? I ' m Lr y i ng 1. > J'lnd irt l1ow w 11 yo,ir seeing conditions w .re compared l.o 1.lif, M rc 1u·y c t·ew ' s . llh -h1 lt. J\nd tl e i mplication that I get i thaL the i mplication is the same condiLion in the daytime with i errical probably because of the way th spaccc r-aCt ·s shnped an multiple scattered l ight .