Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part I, 1965
NASA-UAP-D019 · page 101 of 223
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
Conrad Cooper Cooper Conrad Yes, we did that in Rate Command right on the money. Then we had an S- 8/D-13 and we documented those t hings; Gordo saw part of it and I did.r. 1t . We never did really get a good score. ThE·n at 18: 50 again we alined the platform SEF and seit the computer up to 25 00164 and burned thiE1 reverse coelliptic maneuver at 19:04:18, and that was a good burn too. MCC had put in their Agena computer an Agena ephemeris, and they ran a rendezvous solution on a fake Agena. They had us make the actual burns, and then they computed hJw close we would have wound up. I was told over the radio that we got within 0.2 mile of altitude and 0. 3 mile horizontal distance from where we should have actually been. That was well within the tolerances , so they were apparently fairly pleased with the burns . Then we had S-7 at 2 days 21 tours 33 minutes 02 seconds , and Gordo shot moet of those. They always happened on your wat ch. Yes. Then we did 2 days 21 hours and 50 minutes . We had ,, Apollo Landmark south -· Th.at' s when I woke up and you had tha·~ Lake . . . I