Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965
NASA-UAP-D020 · page 290 of 325
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
279 It is a great deal of difference. Conrad Yes, it was a pretty tight system. This is probably a function of each individual syst em because I remember Jim mentioning the fact that it was so much sloppier in Rate Command RCS and there is a differ ence in the tolerance. But it sure wasn't apparent to us. Both the OAMS and RCS Rate Command systems were just as tight as they could be. Cooper Well, the OAMS Rate Command system definitely was tighter because you could come zapping around with it and the second you let go of the handle it stopped right there. Barn, it never even quivered, just held right there. Conrad Yes, we must have had an outstanding set of rate gyros. The RCS Rate Command there had a wider band. There was so much power and authority in the RCS Rate Command that it actually gave me a little bit of problem just hitting the point, getting lined up on it for retrofire. There was just so much authority you had trouble getting just small amounts of control force until you got used to it. There was so much power there, almost more power than you needed for fine contr ol. It would be interesting to simulate