Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965
NASA-UAP-D020 · page 291 of 325
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
280 similar control torques on the GMS to Eee what kind of off - sets it would take before contr ol problems are encountered. I don ' t belj eve that you would actually set one of the rockeits off enough to bother you. Possibly, you could since it is not a straightline functi on. Cooper We had had adequate amount of reentry ·;raining. If we ' d had a thousand hours more we would not have done anything differently than we did. Conrad The reent ry in the simul ator and the roentry • in flight up to a point went right down the line , I would say to slightly after guidance initiate. Then, the ball angles were ~xtremely steep in flight in comparison to the h·ainer. I would very much like to go back and ta«e a look at this on the t rainer while it is fresh in my mind. I always use the horizon for roll reference in addi tion to the r oll bug. The horizon di sappeared too soon on our reentry. We were looking at all white on the ball there for a long t ime. Cooper We pitched on up pretty good. Conrad Yes, we trimmed out at an awful high angle. The stagnation point on the spacecraft inc.icated we were