Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965
NASA-UAP-D020 · page 33 of 325
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
28 Cooper So then we asked again when we wer e in orbit, "About this under load on GA.MS fuel" . I suspect t hat something was fouled up because we didn ' t get a full 0AMS load. That was pretty bad. Cooper I think monitor ing onboard of propell~mt r emaining t o compl et e the mission was pretty good. The fore cast fuel for missi on completion of GE,mini V ought to be reviewed because somebody didn ' t quite come up with the right fuel figures . Twenty- six percent remaining after the REP would not havE been nearly enough to have ~one the r emainder of the mission. Conrad Yes . I t hi nk t hat in computing the a.mount of fuel used t o perform a maneuver, they figure out how much to get the r ates going but they must s top there. They must not f i gur e how much fuel it takes you to . get back to, say, zer o- zero- zero. Appirentl y t hey assume that whenever you get done with a tracking maneuver, you j ust drift to get back to zero- zero zero. Over the U.S. we had maybe 6 or 7 minutes be t ween a 30 degree pitch- down target to the next 30 degr ee pitch- down target . You ' ve got to t r ack it all t he way through, bing the spacecraft all the way back up and then go to and track the next target .