John Company

Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965

NASA-UAP-D020 · page 33 of 325

Page 33 of 325 of NASA-UAP-D020

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

28
Cooper
So then we asked again when we wer e in orbit,
"About this under load on GA.MS fuel" .
I suspect
t hat something was fouled up because we didn ' t get
a full 0AMS load.
That was pretty bad.
Cooper
I think monitor ing onboard of propell~mt r emaining
t o compl et e the mission was pretty good.
The fore­
cast fuel for missi on completion of GE,mini V ought
to be reviewed because somebody didn ' t quite come up
with the right fuel figures .
Twenty- six percent
remaining after the REP would not havE been nearly
enough to have ~one the r emainder of the mission.
Conrad
Yes .
I t hi nk t hat in computing the a.mount of fuel
used t o perform a maneuver, they figure out how much
to get the r ates going but they must s top there.
They must not f i gur e how much fuel it takes you to .
get back to, say, zer o- zero- zero.
Appirentl y t hey
assume that whenever you get done with a tracking
maneuver, you j ust drift to get back to zero- zero­
zero.
Over the U.S. we had maybe 6 or 7 minutes be­
t ween a 30 degree pitch- down target to the next
30 degr ee pitch- down target .
You ' ve got to t r ack
it all t he way through, bing the spacecraft all the
way back up and then go to and track the next target .