John Company

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

NASA-UAP-D021 · page 104 of 222

Page 104 of 222 of NASA-UAP-D021

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

94
some indication if the tape is on.
On long flights you
can't ha.ve the tape on all the time like the short flights-­
you ha.veto conserve tape.
Cartridge change was no problem.
The controls were adequate. Data Recording? We tried to
record as much data as we could.
:Borman
We didn't indulge in a luxury many times of recording both
in the log book and on the tape. We only had 20 tapes for
a 14 day mission. If we got a good representation of it in
the log book-we didnJt put it on the tape.
Now, we find
out we probably brought back some unused tapes, too.
Lovell
We did. It was hard for a 14 day mission to adequately
budget the tape.
We would try to budget it so th.at we could
get the in:f'orm&tion on there 'Without leaving long periods of
inactivity on the tape. However, we didn't budget it well
enough, and we left about 1 or 2 tapes without any record­
ings.
:Borman
Digital Command System updates were good, no problem--every­
thing worked fine. Real-time transmitter, and delay-time
transmitter were no problem.
As a matter of fact, tb.at
whole system I thought was excellent. The only problem we
had in the area of Digital Command System or the telemetry
was th.at we lost the tape recorder and•••goofed up the de­
1,cy-ed time. The procedure that we worked up for operating