Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965
NASA-UAP-D021 · page 104 of 222
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
94 some indication if the tape is on. On long flights you can't ha.ve the tape on all the time like the short flights- you ha.veto conserve tape. Cartridge change was no problem. The controls were adequate. Data Recording? We tried to record as much data as we could. :Borman We didn't indulge in a luxury many times of recording both in the log book and on the tape. We only had 20 tapes for a 14 day mission. If we got a good representation of it in the log book-we didnJt put it on the tape. Now, we find out we probably brought back some unused tapes, too. Lovell We did. It was hard for a 14 day mission to adequately budget the tape. We would try to budget it so th.at we could get the in:f'orm&tion on there 'Without leaving long periods of inactivity on the tape. However, we didn't budget it well enough, and we left about 1 or 2 tapes without any record ings. :Borman Digital Command System updates were good, no problem--every thing worked fine. Real-time transmitter, and delay-time transmitter were no problem. As a matter of fact, tb.at whole system I thought was excellent. The only problem we had in the area of Digital Command System or the telemetry was th.at we lost the tape recorder and•••goofed up the de 1,cy-ed time. The procedure that we worked up for operating