John Company

Department of the Air Force Report, 1996

DOW-UAP-D048 · page 72 of 181

Page 72 of 181 of DOW-UAP-D048

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

The simulated impact percentages plotted in Figure 25 are identical with those shown
in Figure 24. The theoretical percentages in Figure 25 were obtained by trying various
combinations of B and A until the best possible fit was obtained in the sectors from ±60°
to ±180°. From these plots it seems apparent that a reasonable fit between malfunction-
turn and theoretical Mode-5 impact data can be found for any qa. between 5,000 and
20,000 deg-lb/ft2.
•
I,,_
0 ts
~
C)
Q)
~
1
.
.
··--==~-..................
.5
••••••••....••onnt••••••••••••••••..••i••••ono
oh;••••••••••hU..O:::i: : ................
:.":IS;~~
;•ooooooOoOoo ■
.:,,,00000 ■ 0000 ..uoo
-
:::::::::::::::::::+:::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::..
::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::~:::······ ·········;····
C:
....................~-----·.............,t....................
........,t.................... ; .................... ~----­
!
~
!
:
i
!
---------..········1················..·r················....r....
.................:--·
~
Q)
................... t .................. , l ..................l___________ _
a..
j
~
~
0.1 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::!::::::::::::::::::::!::::::::::_+--
••
t:::::::::::::::::::
n,nnnn•••••--•1/nnooonooooonn, {uuoou••..••••..••l..nu••••
••••--••
••--••••••••••--•••••••
................... : ................u, ! ..................!----·--···
...........
...................r···--·------·······
:::::::::::::::::::t::::::::::::::::::~t.::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::
••••••••••••• .••·····
••
t, :::::::::::::::::::
!,
•
i
i
i
................... ! ................... !...........
j
·············r·················.1....................1...
!
i
:
!
l
i
!
!
!
i
0.01
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Angle From Flight Path {deg)
············-················-
Figure 25. Delta-GEM Simulation Results with Best-Fit Shaping Constants
9/10/96
63
RTI