John Company

Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957

DOW-UAP-D104 · page 504 of 585

Page 504 of 585 of DOW-UAP-D104

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

•
•
19. In comparison with other officers of his grade and approximate length of service or approximate length of duty assignment, to what degree has this officer exhibited
the following qualities?
(a} PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE (Consider the requirements of his various duty assignments and compare them to his professional knowledge )
NOT OBSERVED
□
Hns excoptlonal knowledge
or bis duty assignments.
Extremely woll lnlormed.
Hns excellent knowledge or
most phases ol bis duty
assignments. Is well In·
formed on tho remaining
pbasos. Occasionally dem•
onstratos o.,ceptlonol know!­
edge._
Is woll inCormcd on most
phases or his duty assign­
monts. Frequently demon­
stratos excellent knowledge.
Has satlsfootory knowledge
of routine plmses olbis duty
assignments,
Serious gops In his know!•
edgo of fundamentals or bis
duty assignments.
(Advorso)
.
I
LI.
I
I
I
.
(b} COOPERATION (Consider ablllty and willingness to work In harmony with and for others.)
NOT,.OBSERVED
□
Extremely successful In
working with others. Hns
on outstanding ability to
crcoto harmony.
Promotes harmony In deal-
Ing with others. A very
good tcom worker.
Gets along well with most
people. Knows how to toke
orders. Fits In with a tcom.
Indlacrent to others.
Cooperates occasionally.
Inclined to crcoto friction.
Generally not cooperative.
(Ad verso)
.
I
I
X
I
I
.
(c) J UDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation, think clearly, a nd develop correct and logical conclusions.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Outstandingly sound and
logical thinker with an
o.,coptlonal grasp of the
situation involved.
Excoptlonally good Judg­
ment based on sound evnlu•
atlon of nil tho factors
Involved.
J udgment is usually sound
and rcasonoblo.
Is prone to neglect or mis-
Interpret !nets. Occasion­
ally commits errors in
Judgment.
Duo to faulty Judgment, his
decisions or rccommcnda­ •
tions nro too frequently
,vrong.
(Advorso)
.
I
X
I
I
I
.
(d) LEADERSHIP (Consider his ability In organizing, obtaining the cooperation of others, and In directing their efforts effectively,)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Outstanding skill In direct-
Ing others results In a very
g~~;t:e ~~~ ~g~~~~~Y
difficult oircumstancos.
A consistently good leader.
Commands respect or bis
subordlnntes. Is very offcc­
tivo under difficult clrcum­
stances.
Oapnblo leader. Develops
good cooperation nod tcom
work lu difficult circum­
stances. Knows bow to give
orders.
Generally obtains eaectlve
cooperation under normal
circumstances.
Falls to command. Unable
to exert control.
(Adverse)
.
I
I X
I
I
.
(e) PROMOTION POTENTIAL (Consider his capacity to handle Jobs of Increased scope and greater responsibility, ability to learn rapidly, personality, self.I mprove ment
efforts, special abllltles, and training.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Capnblo of increased rcspon­
slbility and rapid advonco­
mcut.
.
Very promising promotional
material.
Demonstrates promise for
further growth at moderate
rote.
Present Job is taxing bis
capabilities. Requires con•
sidcroblo amount of training.
DcJ!nitely limited.
(Ad verso)
I
X
I
I
I
.
(f) MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS (Consider his utilization of men, money, and materials.)
Is most eacctivo In tho utlli•
Is eaectivo In accomplishing
Conserves men, money, nnd
Utilizes men, money, nud
Is needlessly wasteful ol
NOT OBSERVED
zntion of moo, money, and
oxtra savings in men, mon~
materials elicctlvoJy by im•
materials in a barely satls­
ment monoy, and materials.
materials.
oy, and materials by imple­
plementing and maintain•
!nctory manner.
Is irresponsible in
this
□
menting ond maintaining
ing routine management
regard.
improved management pro­
procedures.
(Ad verso)
cedures.
X
I
I
I
I
(g) REM ARKS. Marks In a ny of the starred (0) boxes must be Justified In this section with a brief description of the factors which were considered In evaluating the
officer. The Justification should be In concrete and specific terms.
•
20. State your estimate of this officer's capacity for original and constructive professional work and Indicate to what degree his performance during this reporting
period has reflected that capacity. State concrete atta inments wherever possible.
If not observeo, so state.
NOT OBSERVED
21. (a) As a general rule, officers should not be shown their fitness reports by the reporting seniors unless the report contains adverse matter. An adverse report
must be referred for statement pursuant to Article 1701- (8) Navy Regulations.
His statement should be attached to this report.
b) Has the officer reported on seen this report?
YES □
22. DATE FORWARDED _8_D_e_c_e_m_b_e_r_l_9_5..:.9____ _
24. ----,.=-:--.,,--""7"--
---,,,-----,____
_
_
_
_ ____
(Signature of regular repartinu , enior if report i8 concurrent)
U. S. COVCRNMENT PRINTING OFPI Clt
16-70100-1