John Company

Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957

DOW-UAP-D104 · page 514 of 585

Page 514 of 585 of DOW-UAP-D104

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

.
•• fi<Qs\ @ffet tlv& In the utili-
NOT OBSERYfD
ill Ql1 ol won, monoy, and
fllaterinls.
CJ
Is effective In accomplishing
Conscn ·cs men, money, and
Uti1iz.cs men, moncr, and
oxtm savings In mon, mon­
mnterlnls effectively by Im­
mntcrinls in n bnroly sntis•
oy, and ma\orlols by Imp le­
lomentlng and mnlntnln­
factory manner.
mentln; and maintainin~
~ g routine management
Improved mnnneement pro-
procedures.
ccduros.
Is nccd lessly wasteful or
men, money, nntl mntcriols.
ls
irresponsible
in
this
regard. (Adverse)
I
'
I
X
I
I
.
19. In comparlgon with other officers of his grade and approximate lena-th of service or approximate lenith of duty assignment to what degree has this officer exhibited
the followlni qualities?
•
'
(a) PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE (Consider t he requirements of his various duty assignments and compare them to his professional knowledge )
NOT OBSERVED
□
H ns exceptional knowled go
or his duty assignments.
Extremely well Informed.
R ns excellent k"Tlowlcdgo or
most phases or his duty
assignments. Is well In­
formed on tho remaining
phases. Occnslonally dem­
onstrotes exceptional know!­
edge.
Is well informed on most
phases or his duty assign-
ments. Frequently demon­
strotcs o.~cellcnt knowledge.
H ns sntisfnctory knowledge
of routine phases or bis duty
assignments.
Serious gaps in his know!-
edge or fundamentals or bis
duty assignments.
(Ad verso)
.
I
I
X
I
I
.
,
(11) COOPERATION (Consider ablllty and willingness to work In harmony with a nd for others )
NOT OBSERV60
□
Extromoly successful in
working with others. Has
an .out.standing o.billty to
create harmony.
P romotes ·harmony In don!-
Ing with others. . A very
good team worker.
Oots along well with most
people. Knows bow to take
orders. F its In with a team.
IndllYerent to others.
Cooperates occnsloually.
Incllned to create friction.
Ooncmlly not coopcmtivo.
(Ad verse)
.
I
I
X
I
I
. .
(c) JU DGMENT (Consider his ablllty to i rasp a s ituation, think clearly, and develop correct and logical conclusions.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Outstnndlnely sound and
logical thinker with an
oxoeptlonal "'11SP of tho
situation Involved.
E xceptionally good judg-
ment based on sound ovalu­
o.tlon or nil tho factors
Involved.
Judgment Is usually sound
ancl rcasonablo.
Is prone to neglect or mis­
interpret facts. Occasion­
ally commits errors In
judgment.
D uo to fnulty judgment, his
decisions or recommonda­
lions arc too lrequently
wrong.
(Ad\'ersc)
.
I
I
X
I
I
.
(d) L!:>,DERSlilP (Consider his ability In organizing, obtaining the cooperation of others, and In d irecting their efforts effectively,)
NQ'\' QBStlW~D
□
Outatnndlng skill In direct-
Ing others rcl;uits In a very
elYectivo Wllt. lns~iros con­
fldoocc ovon un or very
difficult circumstances.
A consistently good leacler.
Commnnds respect or his
subordinates. Is very offec­
tivo under difficult circum­
stanooa.
Copnblo leoder. Dovelops
good cooperation Md team
work in difficult clrcum­
stances. Knows how to give
orders.
Oenemlly obtains ollectivo
cooperation under normol
circlllllstanccs.
Fo.lls to command. Unable
to oxert control.
(Adverse)
.
I
I
I
X
I
.
(~ !'!R~MPTIQl'I POT!;NTIAL. (Con1lder his capacity to handle Jobs of Increased scope and greater responsibility, ability to learn rapidly, personality, self.Improvement
offom, 1peclal a bllltles, and tralnlni:.)
- - ·
I\IIf Ql!§§\'IE!l
□
Ol\fl\lb\e or lnorco.sed respon­
1lb1lity o.nd rapid advnnco­
ment.
Very promlslna promotlonnl
mnterlnl.
Demonstrates promise for
further growth nt modemto
rote.
Present job Is tn,tng his
ropnbilities. Requires con­
sitiemblo amount or training.
Definitely limited.
(Adverse)
.
.
I
I
I
X
I
(f) t,IANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS (Cl!n, loe, his utilization of men, money, and materials.)
(@f lllfif~ll~S. f,fii•ks In any of the starred (•) bcxes must bo Justified In this section with a brief description of the factors which were considered In evaluaung tho
• '
ii(titer,
Tl\e Ju~tlfloatlon 1hould be In concrete and specific terms.
Not Applicable.
20. S,la\e yeu• ,a\lm, te of th\1 ott11:er'1 capacity for original and constructl~e professional work and Indicate to what degree his performance during this reporting
~er\ec\ 1il\% f@tl@e(•<I tl\e.t oijp119\1», ~tate QQnoro\o Mt~lnmonts wherever posslblo.
If not observed, so state.
•.
..•
Not Observea.
2\. (a) As a ljenef;,I f'II@, olfl~•o 1hould not bo 1hown their fitness reports by the reporting s
lors unless the report contains adverse matter. An adverse report
myst ~• ref@ffed !Qr 1\atomont pursuant to Article 1701-(8)
at
nt •ho
1 t a officer reported on seen this report?
YES □
23,
T. W. SOUTH II
(Sig11a/u rt of rtportJ1!JI offiter)
•
I