John Company

Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957

DOW-UAP-D104 · page 516 of 585

Page 516 of 585 of DOW-UAP-D104

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

19. In comparison with other officers of his grade and approximate length of service or approximate length of duty assignment, to what degree has this offlcor exhibited
the following qualities?
(a) PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE (Consider the requirements of his various duty assignments and compare them to his professional knowledge.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
HllS exceptional knowledge
ol bis duty assignments.
Exl.remely well lntormod.
Has excellent lrnowJodgo of
most phases ol bis duty
asslgnmwts. Is well In•·
formed on tho remaining
phases. Occasionally dem­
. onstrntes exceptional know!•
• edge.
Is well Informed on most
phases of bis duty assign-
ments. Frequently demon- •
strates excellent knowlodco.
'
Hos satisfactory lrnowledge
of routine phases ol bis duty
nssignmwts.
Serious gaps In bis know!­
edge or fundamentals of bis
duty assignments.
(Adveno)
•
I
X
I
. ·. ~1
I.
.
(b) COOPERATION (Consider ability and wlllln1tness to work in harmony with and for others.) •
NOT .OBSERVED
□
Extremely successful In
workini: with others. Hns
an outstandini: ability to
create harmony.
Promotes harmony In deal-
inf with others.
A very
i:ood team worker.
Gots along well with piost
people. Knows bow to take
ordors. Fits In with a tnnm.
Indif!erent to others.
Cooperates occaslonaJJy.
.
Inclined to c~eato friction.
Generally not cooperative.
(Advorso)
.
I
X
I
I
.
I
.
(c) JUDGMENT (Consider his ability to i:rasp a situation, think clearly, and develop correct a nd logical conclusions.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Outstandingly sound and
101:icnl thinker with an
oxccptional grasp of tho
situation involved.
Exceptionally i:ood Judg­
mcnt based on sound evalu­
ation or all tho factors
Involved.
Jud1:111ent is usually sound
nnd reasonable.
Is prone to neglect or mis-
Interpret facts. Occasion-
ally commits errors In
Judgment.
Duo to faulty Judgment, bis
decisions or rccommcnda­
tlons aro too lrcquently
wrong.
(Adverse)
.
I
X
I
I
I
.
(d) LEADERSHIP (Consider his ability In ori:anlzlni:. obtalnlni: the cooperation of others, and In dlrectlni: their efforts effectively.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Outstanding skill in direct-
Ing others results In n very
effective unit. Inspires con­
fidence even under very
difficult circumstances.
A consistently good lender.
Commands respect or bis
subordinates. ls very effoo­
tive nuder difficult circum­
stances.
Capable leader. Dovolops
good coopcrntlon and team
work In difficult c!rcum­
stances. Knows bow to glve
orders. •
Oencrnlly obtains orrcctlvo
cooperation under normal
circumstances.
Falls to command. Unable
to exert control.
(Adverse)
.
I
X
I
I
I
.
(e) PROMOTION POTENTIAL (Consider his capacity to handle Jobs of Increased scope and ereater rosponslblllty, ability to learn rapidly, personality, ••II-Improvement
eflorts, special abilities, and tralnlni:.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Capable or Increased rcspon­
slbility and rapid advance­
mcnt.
Very promlslni: promotional
material.
Demonstrntos promise for
further i:rowtb at moderate
rate.
Present Job Is taxing bis
capabilities. Requires con­
siderableamount of training.
Dellnltoly limited.
(Advorso)
.
I
X
I
I
I
.
(I) MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS (Consider his utilization of men, money. and materials.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Is most etlectlve In the utlli-
zntlon ol mw, money, and
material,.
Is ef!ective In occomplisblng
oxtrn savings In men, mon­
oy, and materials by implo­
mentlng and maintalnlng
improved managament pro­
ccduros.
Conserves men, money, and
materials effectively by Im•
plemeutlng and maintain•
llllt routine manoi:emont
procedures.
Utilizes mon, monoy, and
mntcrlnls In n barely sntls­
loctory manner.
Is nccdlossly wasteful ol
men, money, and motorlals.
Is lrrcsponslblo in
this
regard.
(Adverse)
.
I
X
I
I
I
.
(It) REMARKS. Marks In any of the starred (") boxes must be Justified In this section with a brief description of the factors which were considered In evaluating the
officer. The Justification should be In concrete and specific terms.
Not applicable
20. State your estimate of this officer's capacity for original and constructive professional work and Indicate to what degreo his performance during thl• reportlni:
period has reflected that capacity. State concrete attainments wherever possible.
If not observed, so state.
ot observed
21. (a) As a general rule. officers should not be shown their fitness reports by the reporting seniors unless the report contains o.dverse matter. An adverse report
must be referred for statement pursuant to Article 1701-(8) Navy Regula.ti
His statement should be attached to J~I• r~port.
(b Has the officer reported on seen this report?
YES □
s·oJUN l~!Jd
T. A. CHRISTOPHER
22. DAT E FORWARDED _ _____ _ ___________ 23. ------- - ~~---,--~-=--,---- - -----­
(Sig-nature of report/no offiur)
24· ----=----,--.---.,---
..,--,.,..--,--,-- --,,-----­
(Signaturc of regular reporting mrior ff repon i4 concurrent)
U, S. OOVHNMINT f'A IHTING ornc,;
l&-?QIQV-1