Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

a
'_tfll 2 1957 J
A ·
IIAVPERS-!iO tllEV. 3-841
--
REPMr~ THE FITNESS OF OFFICERS ...
THE 0FFICER REPORTED ON WILL FILL IN-THE FIRST ELEVEN SECTIONS:
I. NAME (La.,t)
(Fir,t)
(M iddlt)
2. GRADE
3. USN (R)
4. DESIGNATOR
5. FILE NO.
NEWHOUSE
Delbert
Clement
CW0-4
USN
8311
177283
6. SHIP OR STATION
Naval Air Technical Trainin Unit
NAS Pensacola Fla.
8. OCCASION FOR REPORT
9. T YPE OF REPORT
SEMI -
i;;-J
DET ACH MENT OF
fv1
DETACHMENT □
fvl
CON-
□
□
ANNUAL IA.J
REPORTING SENIOR 1.6:J
OF OFF ICER
REGULAR LA.I
CURRENT
SPECIAL
7. DAT E REPORTED PRESENT DUTY STATION
21 Mar 1956
10 . PERIOD OF REPORT
FROM
TO
12/31/56
6/21/57
11. DUTIES. L i•t principal dutiu assioned includino watche•, and Indicate in parenthe,., after each th• number of month• during th, r,porting period. If iusiunme·m I• in other than
regular Navu billet or involve, dutiea not well establiahed, gfvt outlint of purpost, ,cope, and , (gnificance of such duties. If necea,ary, us, separate •hut and attach to thu form.
Ground Phase Officer PH(A) School (6)
00D
6
Signature of officer reported on:
FOLLOWING TO BE FILLED IN BY THE REPORTING OFFICER:
12. EMPLOYMENT OF COMMAND DURING PERIOD OF THIS REPORT
Training Navy aerial and ground photographers and photographic officers
13. REFERENCE HERE AND APPEND ANY COMMENDABLE OR ADVERSE REPORTS ON THIS OFFICER RECEIVED CURING T HE PERIOD OF T HIS REPORT
14. PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES (fo compari,on with other officer• of hi• grade and approximate length of aervice, comider the requirements of hia duliea and evaluate hi• performance.)
,.. .
DUTY ASSIGNMENT
(a) Present Assignment
(b) As
00D
Watch Officer
(c) Collateral Duties
(d) T echnical Speclalty~ Qt-0--::-- -~:;-
(e) Ship Handling
(f) In Administration
(g) Ability to Command
(h) As Executive or Division Officer
(I)
Duty on a Staff
U> Other
15. Consldorlng t ho r,osslblo requirement s of
war. Indicate your att:ltudo toward ha wing
this officer undor your command .. Would you:
N
Outstanding p or •
E xcellent perform-
Competent and em-
Satisfactory per-
0
T
rormnnco in most
anco in most aspects
cicnt porformnnce
formnnco in most
aspects or his duty
or his duty assign-
in most aspects or
aspects of his duty
0
assignments. High-
ments. Eliiciont or
his duty assign-
assignmcn ts. Needs
B
ly quallJlcd.
competen t in most
moots. Frequently
some supervision.
s
or the remaining as-
demonstrates excel-
Basically qualified.
E
pects.
Frequently
lent performance.
n
demonstrates out-
V
standing perform-
E
ance.
D
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Inadequate por-
formance in many
aspects or his duty
assignments. Needs
close supervision.
He Is not qualified.
(Adverse)
P.>rtl cul orJy
P refer not
dosl ro to
Prefer h im D
Bo pl eased t o i;;i
Bo &atl!ifiod
t o h .:avo him?
havo him?
□
to most?
h ;,vo h im?
IA.J
to hnvo h im ? □
(Advono)
□
16. (a) In comparison wit h other officers of his grade and approximate length of service. how would you designate this officer?
(b) For t his report period Indicate In (b) how many officers of his grade you have designated In each category of (e).
Oue or the fow highly
outstanding officers I
know
A very fine officer
great value to the
service
or
A dopendablo and typi­
cally efiectlvo officer
An acccptnble officer
Unsatisfnctory
(Adverse)
(a)
X
(b)
?
2
2
0
0
In thu section ,t I• zm:porlant that the out, tandmg characterrstic, of the officer, and anu weaknust• which senou,lv affect hu performance of dmv, be reported.
17 . COMMENTS.
The
appraisal , hould be concilo and concrete m tu~ of specific example& of performance from which the more general factor& can be in/trred. The appraz,al will j ustifv the mark• auigned in
itw ,s 14 16 and 1G, above. In addition, th• appraisal should include ouutanding qualification• in anv field ,uch as the followrnu: admini,lration, f)lanni11g, lool•tico, electronico new
w,aponi , and in dealing with the public in personal or official contact,. Thi• •pace 111u,t n ot be left blank.
'
GHPHar NEWHOUSE 1s an experienced and well-qualifi ed photographic specialist. He is
jnterested and strives to improve the PH(A) School photographic training program.
He
bas a pleasant easy-goi ng disposition.
At t i mes, he gives the impression of not having
suffici ent enthusi asm and drive; however, t hi s is countered by t he fact that t he school
phase under his supervisi on has been operating in a smoot h and ef fi cient manner .
He
is of excellent moral character.
18. NAME, GRADE, AND FILE NUMBER OF REPORTING OFFICER. OFFICIAL STATUS RELATIVE TO OFFICER REPORTED ON.
EDWIN L. KIEM, CDR, USN, 78971/1310, Commanding Officer
16-70101>-l