Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957
DOW-UAP-D104 · page 522 of 585
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
19. In comparlsotl with' othei' offlcer:s at hi$ graci8 a~,d apJ?rOJ<lm~~flen~h C?f.setVIJlG or~~iito><lrrtatt? l~~gth;4(duty assignment, to what degree has this officer exhibited the followlng qualltles? • • • • ' (a) PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE (Consider the requirements of his various duty assignments and compare them to his professional knowledge.) NOT OBSERVED □ Has exceitfonal knowledge of his uty assignments. Extremely well informed. -~ ' • -· .1 •. Has excellent knowledge or most phases or his duty assignments. Is well in formed on the remaining phases. Occasionally dem onstrates exceptional know! ~ge. ·r • X .I. Is well Informed on most phases or his duty assign ments. Frequently demon- stratas excellent knowledge. I : Has satisfactory knowledge of routine ~bases or his duty asslgnmen ...I .. , .. Serious gaps in his know! edge or fwidamentals of his duty assignments. (Adverse) • - . ':• . (b) COOPERATION (Consldei: ablllty.and willingness to work In harrio.nY. w/th l\fld for. others.) • NOT OBSERVED ; D ..· • •• Extreµiely successful In . ·working with others. Has an: outstanqfng _ability to create ha~ony. . • Promotes harmony in deal-• Ing with • others~ • A· very good team worker. ·. . CN3ts along well: with most people. Knows how to take • !)rders:• ll'itlfJ,µ·'!l~bateam.:· • ln4l~eren~ to others. :.·, , • 0ooperates oocaslonairy. • •"<'". ,_. Incllned to ·create frlctlon. · Generally not •cooperative. • , ... _·. '.·½dv~) I I X (c) JUDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation, think clearly, and develop correct and logical conclusions.) NOT OBSERVED □ Outstandingly sound and logical thinker with an exceptional grasp of the situation involved. Exceptionally good judg ment based on sound evalu ation of all the factors involved. Judgment. ls usually sound and reasonable. Is prone to neglect or mis interpret facts. Occaslon ally commits errors in ' Judgment. Due to faulty judgment, his decisions or recommend11 tlons aro too frequently wrong. '. (Adverse) I I X I I • (d) LEADERSHIP (Consider his ablllty In organizing, obtaining the cooperation of others, and In directing their efforts effectively.) NOT OBSERVED □ Outstanding skill in direct- Ing others results in a very efJcctfvo unit. Ins~ires con fldence even un er very difficult circumstances. A consistently good leader. Commands respect or his subordinates. Is very effec tive under dlfflcult circum stances. Capable leader. Develops good cooperation and team work in difficult clrcum stances. Knows how to give orders. Generally obtains effective cooperation under normal circumstances. Falls to command. Unable to exert control. (Adverse) • I ., I X I I • (e) PROMOTION POTENTIAL (Consider his capacity.to handle Jobs of Increased scope and greater responsibility, ablllty to learn rapidly, personality, self-Improvement efforts, special ablllt£es, and trafnlng.) NOT OBSERVED □ Caflable of increased respon sib lfty and rapid advance ment. Very promising promotional materlal. Demonstrates promise for further growth at moderate rate. . , Present Job ls taxing his abilities. Requires con ~ arable amount of training. Definitely llmlted. (Adverse) • I ,, I X I I • (f) MANAGEMENT EFFEC,:IV~~t;:5? (Consider his utilization of men, money, and materials.) ,, '. '' Is effective in accomplishing Is most effective in the utill- Conserves men, money, and Utilizes men, money, and Is needlessly wastefnl of NOT OBSERVED zatlon of men, money, and extra savings in men, mon materials effectively by lm• materials in a barely satis mntepals. ~en~~!m:i~ ey, and materlals by imple ri! ementing and . maintain- factory manner. menting and maintaining g routine management regard. □ (Adverse) ures. !:K roved management pro p~ures. • • I I X I I (g) REMARKS. Marks In any of the starred <-> boxes must be Justified In this section with a brief description of the factors which were considered In evaluating the officer. The Justification should be In concrete and specific terms. Not applicable 20. State your estimate of this officer's capacity for original and constructive professional work and Indicate to what deiree_hls performance during this reportlnc period has reflected that capacity. State concrete attainments wherever possible. If not observed, so state. Not observed 21. (a) As a general rule, officers should not be shown thelr_.fltness reports by the reporting seniors unless the report contains adverse matter, An adverse report must be referred for statement pursuant to Article 1701-(8) Navy Regulations. His statement should be attached to this r.:eport. 1 , • • -.- , ... (b) Has the-officer.reported .on seen this report?. . YES 0-_ NO,~ 24,---~=--~--=-----,,----,,,--....,..-.,....---,-..---~---- (Signature of regular reporting ienfor if rez,ort 18 concurrent) U, S, GOVEllNNINT PRINTING OFPICI 16-70109-1 c..o . ' . ~ : I ~ • •