John Company

Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957

DOW-UAP-D104 · page 522 of 585

Page 522 of 585 of DOW-UAP-D104

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

19. In comparlsotl with' othei' offlcer:s at hi$ graci8 a~,d apJ?rOJ<lm~~flen~h C?f.setVIJlG or~~iito><lrrtatt? l~~gth;4(duty assignment, to what degree has this officer exhibited
the followlng qualltles?
• •
• •
'
(a) PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE (Consider the requirements of his various duty assignments and compare them to his professional knowledge.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Has exceitfonal knowledge
of his
uty assignments.
Extremely well informed.
-~
'
•
-·
.1
•.
Has excellent knowledge or
most phases or his duty
assignments. Is well in­
formed on the remaining
phases. Occasionally dem­
onstrates exceptional know!­
~ge.
·r •
X
.I.
Is well Informed on most
phases or his duty assign­
ments. Frequently demon-
stratas excellent knowledge.
I
:
Has satisfactory knowledge
of routine ~bases or his duty
asslgnmen
...I ..
, ..
Serious gaps in his know!­
edge or fwidamentals of his
duty assignments.
(Adverse)
• - . ':• .
(b) COOPERATION (Consldei: ablllty.and willingness to work In harrio.nY. w/th l\fld for. others.)
•
NOT OBSERVED
; D ..·
•
•• Extreµiely successful In­ .
·working with others. Has
an: outstanqfng _ability to
create ha~ony. .
•
Promotes harmony in deal-•
Ing with • others~ • A· very
good team worker.
·.
.
CN3ts along well: with most
people. Knows how to take •
!)rders:• ll'itlfJ,µ·'!l~bateam.:·
• ln4l~eren~ to others. :.·,
,
• 0ooperates oocaslonairy. •
•"<'".
,_.
Incllned to ·create frlctlon.
· Generally not •cooperative.
• , ... _·. '.·½dv~)
I
I
X
(c) JUDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation, think clearly, and develop correct and logical conclusions.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Outstandingly sound and
logical thinker with an
exceptional grasp of the
situation involved.
Exceptionally good judg­
ment based on sound evalu­
ation of all the factors
involved.
Judgment. ls usually sound
and reasonable.
Is prone to neglect or mis­
interpret facts. Occaslon­
ally commits errors in
'
Judgment.
Due to faulty judgment, his
decisions or recommend11­
tlons aro too frequently
wrong.
'.
(Adverse)
I
I
X
I
I
•
(d) LEADERSHIP (Consider his ablllty In organizing, obtaining the cooperation of others, and In directing their efforts effectively.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Outstanding skill in direct-
Ing others results in a very
efJcctfvo unit. Ins~ires con­
fldence even un er very
difficult circumstances.
A consistently good leader.
Commands respect or his
subordinates. Is very effec­
tive under dlfflcult circum­
stances.
Capable leader. Develops
good cooperation and team
work in difficult clrcum­
stances. Knows how to give
orders.
Generally obtains effective
cooperation under normal
circumstances.
Falls to command. Unable
to exert control.
(Adverse)
•
I
.,
I
X
I
I
•
(e) PROMOTION POTENTIAL (Consider his capacity.to handle Jobs of Increased scope and greater responsibility, ablllty to learn rapidly, personality, self-Improvement
efforts, special ablllt£es, and trafnlng.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Caflable of increased respon­
sib lfty and rapid advance­
ment.
Very promising promotional
materlal.
Demonstrates promise for
further growth at moderate
rate.
. ,
Present Job ls taxing his
abilities. Requires con­
~ arable amount of training.
Definitely llmlted.
(Adverse)
•
I
,,
I
X
I
I
•
(f) MANAGEMENT EFFEC,:IV~~t;:5? (Consider his utilization of men, money, and materials.)
,,
'.
''
Is effective in accomplishing
Is most effective in the utill-
Conserves men, money, and
Utilizes men, money, and
Is needlessly wastefnl of
NOT OBSERVED
zatlon of men, money, and
extra savings in men, mon­
materials effectively by lm•
materials in a barely satis­
mntepals.
~en~~!m:i~
ey, and materlals by imple­
ri!
ementing and . maintain-
factory manner.
menting and maintaining
g routine management
regard.
□
(Adverse)
ures.
!:K
roved management pro­
p~ures.
•
•
I
I
X
I
I
(g) REMARKS. Marks In any of the starred <-> boxes must be Justified In this section with a brief description of the factors which were considered In evaluating the
officer. The Justification should be In concrete and specific terms.
Not applicable
20. State your estimate of this officer's capacity for original and constructive professional work and Indicate to what deiree_hls performance during this reportlnc
period has reflected that capacity.
State concrete attainments wherever possible. If not observed, so state.
Not observed
21. (a) As a general rule, officers should not be shown thelr_.fltness reports by the reporting seniors unless the report contains adverse matter, An adverse report
must be referred for statement pursuant to Article 1701-(8) Navy Regulations.
His statement should be attached to this r.:eport. 1
,
•
•
-.- ,
...
(b) Has the-officer.reported .on seen this report?. . YES 0-_ NO,~
24,---~=--~--=-----,,----,,,--....,..-.,....---,-..---~----­
(Signature of regular reporting ienfor if rez,ort 18 concurrent)
U, S, GOVEllNNINT PRINTING OFPICI
16-70109-1
c..o
. ' .
~
: I
~
•
•
­