Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957
DOW-UAP-D104 · page 523 of 585
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
HAVPERS-3 10 IREV. !1•54) THE OFFICER REPORTED ON WILL FILL IN THE FIRST ELEVEN SECTIONS: 1. NAME(La.!t) (Fir,t) (Middle) 2. GRADE 3. USN (R) 4. DESIGNATOR 5. FILE NO. NEWHOUSE Del bert Clement CHPHOT USN 8311 177283 6. SHIP OR STATION W-4 DETACHMENT □ OF OFFICER Naval Air Technical NAS Pensacola Fla. 8. OCCASION FOR REPORT 9. TYPE OF REPORT SEMI• fii'l DETACHMENT OF □ ANNUAL lli,J REPORTING SENIOR REGULAR [XI ~~~~ENT □ SPECIAL □ 7. DATE REPORTED PRESENT DUTY STAT ION 21 March 1956 10. PERIOD OF REPORT 6/30/56 12/31/56 FROM TO 11. DUTIES. List principal duti,a au iumd i11cludin9 watches, a11d i11dicate in parenth<8C8 after each the number of month• duri110 the reporting period. If a••ionment i• in other than regular N avv billet or i11colc<8 duti<1 not wtll u tabli•hed, gice outline of vurpou, acope, and S1g11ificance of ,uch duti<8. If n,ce,,arv, u,e separate aheet a11d attach to thi8 form. Ground .Phase Officer PH(A) School (6), Aerial Phase Officer PH(A) School (2) - OOD (6) \ Siunature of officer reported on: FOLLOWING TO BE FILLED IN BY THE REPORTING OFFICER: 12. EMPLOYMENT OF COMMAND DURING PERIOD OF T HIS REPORT Training Navy aerial and ground photographers and photographic officers 13. REFERENCE HERE AND APPEND ANY COMMENDABLE OR ADVERSE REPORTS ON THIS OFFICER RECEIVED DURING T HE PERIOD OF T HIS REPORT None 14. PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES (ln eompari• on with other officer, of hi• grade and approximate length of &eroice, con,ider the requirement• of Iii, dutie, and ecal uate hi• performance.) DUTY ASSIGNMENT (a) Present Assignment (b) As 00D Watch Officer (c) Collateral Duties (d) T och nlcal Specialty ...El:io.t-Gg-!!a-ohJr (e) Ship Handling (f) In Administ ration (g) Abil ity to Command (h) A.~=t!.v.c..clf Division Officer (I) Dut y on a Staff U) Other N Outstnndlng per • Excellent perform- Competent and cm- Sntlsfnctory per- 0 T formnnco in most nnco in m ost nspects clcnt performanco formnnce in most aspects of his duty of his dut y assign- in most nspects of nspects or his duty 0 nssignments. lllgb- ments. Efficient or his duty assign- assignments. N eeds D l y quollficd. competent in most mcnts. Frequently some supervision. s or tho remaining !\S• demonstrates excel• Dusically qualified. B pccts. Frequently lent performance. R demonstrates out- V stnnding perform- F, nnco. D X X X X X X X X X X Inadequate per- formance in many nspects of bis duty assignments. N ceds close supervision. llo 1.9 not quallfied. (Adverso) 15. Constdcrlng tho posslblo rcqulremonh of Particularly war. lndlcato your attitude townrtl having dcslro to Profor him ~ Bo pfo:isod to D Bo satlsOod this otnccr under your command. Would you: hove him ? □ to most? La ho1wo him? to hove him? □ Profer not to have him? (Adveno) □ 16. (a) In comparison w ith other officers of his grade and approximate length of service, how would you designate this officer? (b) For this report period Indicate In (b) how many officers of his grade you have designated In each category of (a) . Ono of tho few highly A l"cry fiuo ofiiccr of A dcpondablo nnd typi- An acccptnblo officer outstanding officers I grc:it voluo to tho cally ctrectlve officer know service (a) X (b) 1 /.J. 1 0 Unsntisfactory (Adverse) 0 17. COMMENTS. In th18 uct,on ,t u important that th• Olll3tandrno charactomt1c> of the officer , and a11v weakneu e, which ,mou,lv affect hia performanet of dutv, be reported. The apprai, at &hould be conci,e and concrete in term• of , pecific u amp/c, of perf ormance from which the more o<neral factor, can be inf erred. The apprai,al willju3tifv the mark• a31igntd in ilw18 14, 16, and 16, aboco. In addition, th, apprai, al 1hould i11cl11de ouWandi110 qualijicatio111 in anv field auch a• the followmo: admini,tralion, pla11ning, louiatiu , olectroniu new woapona, and in cloali11g with the p ublic in per1011al or official contact,. Thia apace mu,t 110/ be loft bla11k. ' CHPHOT NEtlHOUSE has displayed consi stent reliability. He accepts and carries out his assi gnment s and responsibilities in an excellent manner and with dispatch.. He has assumed responsibility for more ,jobs than would normally be assigned to him due to a shortage of personnel, but his years of exPerience in the field of photography, coupled with his amiable nature have enabled him to efficiently handle t he additional work. He is impeccable in his wearing of the uniform and in his military manner. 18. Ni\ME, GRADE, AND FILE NUMBER OF REPORTING OFFICER. OFFICIAL STATUS RELATIVE TO OFFICER REPORTED ON. EDWIN L. KIEM, CDR, USN, 78971/1310, Commanding Of ficer Ul-'IOlQlt-1